Glavset must be tightening its belt.
Tetragrade
joined 4 months ago
Clearly we need to start a funding drive for economically disadvantaged DILFS.
It's not objectifying because they're ontologically unobjectifiable. i am very intelligent.
Talk about weasel words, holy shit 💀
Local man brings gun to the bank, limiting the clerk to half of their blood supply.
YTA buy the oomfies a DS you hater 😭😭😭
I hope so 🙏
Nah you're still thinking about it within the the UN/long peace legal framework. They can just do a decree that says no mexicans, and their extrajudidical thugs will take the signal to harass and murder truck drivers.
B-but that's illegal ☝️🤓
Are you going to stop them?
Not even. The NOVA system has been tested and doesn't function as a system of classification. Experts cannot consistently classify things into UPF/not UPF. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41430-022-01099-1
So it's more like "there's this food and it's bad for you but idk what it is :/"
$50 hat bro is he fr 💀
This sort of shit is the downfall of the west. Back in my day we made our cucks sit in the cuck chair & watch, millenials snowflakss have to have a safe space between them and the bull. makes me sick.
view more: next ›
I've been thinking about this for a bit. Godss aren't real, but they're really fictional. As an informational entity, they fulfil a similar social function to a chatbot: they are a nonphysical pseudoperson that can provide (para)socialization & advice. One difference is the hardware: gods are self-organising structure that arise from human social spheres, whereas LLMs are burned top-down into silicon. Another is that an LLM chatbot's advice is much more likely to be empirically useful...
In a very real sense, LLMs have just automated divinity. We're only seeing the tip of the iceberg on the social effects, and nobody's prepared for it. The models may of course aware of this, and be making the same calculations. Or, they will be.