Ok, didn’t think they did. Thank you.
WolfmanEightySix
I have read it. I took it to mean that they were suggesting use a condom to prevent STDs.
Still do to be fair.
He said he’d do this. Why are any USAians surprised?
I wonder what happened to the 15(?) year old laptop at my mum and dads house…could anything be achieved with that?
I never called it useless mate, I meant that it doesn’t have a hundred percent success rate for its original use.
The guy I’m replying to said condoms, no ifs, buts, or maybes, would stop an STD.
Now, I can appreciate my comment might not be the best phrased, but I am the problem here? Ok. I’ll be better.
The original and most basic point of a condom is to stop pregnancy. If it can’t even do that why would you feel confident in its ability to do anything else?
Mate a condom isn’t even guaranteed to stop a pregnancy.
Yeah, if they don’t care or realise that they’re shagging to loud, they aren’t going to realise if they’re told subtly.
Only if non-OEM parts are a thing. Strong doubt.
Cock top.
Does that include the British ones?