WolfmanEightySix

joined 2 months ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 15 hours ago

Does that include the British ones?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 18 hours ago

Ok, didn’t think they did. Thank you.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

I have read it. I took it to mean that they were suggesting use a condom to prevent STDs.

Still do to be fair.

[–] [email protected] 50 points 1 day ago (3 children)

He said he’d do this. Why are any USAians surprised?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago (5 children)

I wonder what happened to the 15(?) year old laptop at my mum and dads house…could anything be achieved with that?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

I never called it useless mate, I meant that it doesn’t have a hundred percent success rate for its original use.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (4 children)

The guy I’m replying to said condoms, no ifs, buts, or maybes, would stop an STD.

Now, I can appreciate my comment might not be the best phrased, but I am the problem here? Ok. I’ll be better.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago (9 children)

The original and most basic point of a condom is to stop pregnancy. If it can’t even do that why would you feel confident in its ability to do anything else?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 days ago (11 children)

Mate a condom isn’t even guaranteed to stop a pregnancy.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Yeah, if they don’t care or realise that they’re shagging to loud, they aren’t going to realise if they’re told subtly.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago

Only if non-OEM parts are a thing. Strong doubt.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 days ago (1 children)
 
view more: next ›