apis

joined 2 years ago
[–] apis@beehaw.org 1 points 1 month ago

Have always loved Dixon.

Reminds me of being a very small child, in that cusp between everything being strange and inscrutable, and the unshakeable confidence that everything sometime would be solved.

Though the friezes my toddler self gazed upon baffled and sleepless were much simpler, as a preteen pretending with protractors simpler again being mostly transparent, now blank and pitiless, there's all the plainlitoccult puzzlement of youth

no wonder my brow so furrows

[–] apis@beehaw.org 2 points 3 months ago

Might not even flag up the origin of the term, unless the person queries why it has fallen out of use.

Mostly because it can lead to them feeling the need to then explain that they didn't use it with eugenic sympathies, and me needing to reassure them that I knew that they used it in innocence, all of which is a big diversion from the original topic of conversation.

I feel it easy enough to mention a change in terminology where there's a good deal of consensus regarding the switch, as there is with Asperger's & Oriental, but altogether more delicate where members of a group are split on which they prefer for themselves. Not because I find it difficult to acknowledge & move to the language the person I am speaking with prefers, but because I see the blinkers come down when gently explaining to others who want a definitive answer that there is no consensus, and to take it gently themselves.

[–] apis@beehaw.org 1 points 3 months ago

A skilled therapist will be able to assist anyone to use CBT or other modality as a tool, even if they don't have training or experience specific to that person's needs.

Nobody here needs to be told that finding such a therapist is far from a given, and engaging one who is not helpful (or worse) tends to make it hard to convince oneself to try with a new therapist. Run through a few, and the reluctance compounds into aversion.

That said, I do feel that CBT attracts therapists who have a strong preference for an unreflective practise, and who are more comfortable with very straightforward & commonplace anxieties.

It doesn't help that many health services, whether publicly or privately funded, push short courses of CBT as the predominant or sole psychological therapy. Even a highly skilled therapist will struggle to arrive at the point of being of assistance to those whose difficulties don't map so closely to those most commonly found in the general population, if they have just six 45 minute sessions to work with, and even more so if the person comes to them undiagnosed.

[–] apis@beehaw.org 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Got it. And what did you make of her suggesting that in response?

[–] apis@beehaw.org 2 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Wait, did your caseworker just announce this eligibility to you without you having asked about it?

Or have I wildly misread the situation?

[–] apis@beehaw.org 14 points 5 months ago

Late to reply, but very excited to have Moldova in our Union. I realise a yes vote is not a given, so all power for continuing the campaign to join if it does not succeed this time.

[–] apis@beehaw.org 7 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Going to come back to this to reflect in more detail to your original post and to this comment, but wanted to quickly float the idea that perhaps these people view you as particularly sound, so when they lay things on you or are just more emotional or intense in front of you, and you seem unphased - neither rushing to condemn them nor scrambling to reassure - they interpret that as disapproval from someone whom they find sound. And that because they value your judgement & integrity, they get sheepish and awkward in the absence of a strong outward reaction, which in turn you interpret as them thinking ill of you.

Only suggesting this because have seen quite a bit of this between people, and experienced mild versions of both ends of that dynamic.

Not that it helps, if it even resonates, or provides guidance.

[–] apis@beehaw.org 5 points 6 months ago

Entirely different groups of people, and they're profoundly opposed to each other.

At the core of this massive protest/strike are groups which have been against the bombardment of Gaza from the outset, and protesting Israel's war against Palestinians for years.

[–] apis@beehaw.org 3 points 7 months ago

The portrait of Herzog which we all want to see, is the one he produces himself.

[–] apis@beehaw.org 6 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Reading the alt-text one might imagine a well-filled used condom of an especially fine latex.

Which isn't inaccurate, but now imagine the above gazing at a girl the second Terminator right before it spears Conor's foster mother right through her eyesocket.

[–] apis@beehaw.org 5 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Keeping a few of those little lens cleaning cloths in convenient places is about all I can think of. They launder fine too, if you notice any become less effective at removing smears.

If you ever need a new prescription, they should be able to put the new lenses in your current frame. Similarly, if your frame ever gets broken but your lenses are undamaged, they can pop them in a new frame. That said, keeping old glasses as spares is useful, and it can be fun to have new frames.

[–] apis@beehaw.org 2 points 8 months ago

UK Labour's position on Gaza is no different to that of the Tories (or to the DNC in the US). In Scotland, the SNP is strongly pro-Gaza, but were wiped out. That's likely to have been in matters besides Palestine, but voters had the option to prioritise it and roundly rejected it. In NI & Wales, pro-Gazan candidates did less considerably less well than predicted 18 months ago. A few pro-Gazan candidates ran for the Workers' Party - a handful of them won seats, but others, including their party head lost theirs. Meantime far-right Reform loathe Israel & loathe Palestine more, but made massive gains.

In France, pro-Gazan FI is a major component of NFP, the alliance which got the biggest vote share, but they only scraped that by working strategically with the rest of the left & with the neolibs to see off the far-right, and even this alliance did not win a majority. Within this there's little to no agreement on Palestine, and FI's position drew in some voters and alienated others.

 

When I go to the login page, my username and password are autofilled, but clicking the login button produces no response.

If I delete the contents of both autofill boxes and then give permission to my device's request to fill the username and password, the login button works as it should.

Tried clearing cache and cookies with no Beehaw or Lemmy pages open. Removing login details from saved passwords and entering them manually works, but only as a onetime thing. Saw a suggestion that a shorter password might work but bit wary of this without further guidance.

It wouldn't be super noticeable, but am getting logged out several times a session when browsing via phone.

~~EDIT: May have just created a duplicate of this question, as this post wasn't showing up from my profile or from the community. The second one isn't showing, but could appear soon! Apologies for that.~~

FURTHER EDIT: discovered that when I get logged out, if I open a new tab to Beehaw, I'll be logged in on that tab without. This is so easy that it doesn't count as awkward, and my settings make it very obvious visually whether am logged in or not.

 

Keep encountering a minor bug on Firefox, but unsure where to report it.

Cheers.

view more: next ›