auraithx

joined 4 months ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 hours ago

Some guy fantasising about shooting up public spaces if any of his loved ones get cancer from exhaust fumes.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

I wasn't arguing against building communities to be built around human beings, I'm saying they aren't so it's infeasible.

I've never seen anyone with kids on bikes here because it'd be miserable. Narrow roads, parked traffic, and no safe routes from A->B for most things. No bike routes, can't go on the motorway, backroads are a death sentence. Looking at a cargo bike - never seen one IRL - that would fit a small weekly shop. Then you have the kids and all their stuff. God forbid we want to take the dog also.

There's no need to spend on a car. There's a shop for essentials within walking distance like there is anywhere I've lived in the UK, you could just not visit people who live further than walking distance from you, rely on other people to drop off things for you. Spend a lot more time commuting doing smaller trips to avoid being overloaded, spend more in the expensive local shops. Order a delivery from ASDA instead of driving around the zero waste shops, local co-ops, etc. Just a lot less practical and more restrictive. Not really edge cases, people use their cars to transport stuff regularly. New homes take time to build up, new family members, refurbishments, events, etc. If you don't drive then someone else is doing it for you or you're just doing less.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 hours ago (3 children)

The juice and alcohol would barely fit in the carts

Move furniture frequently, do have a physical disability, pets, kids. Not feasible without a car. Using taxis all the time would be a fortune and kinda defeats the purpose, no?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (8 children)

Are you single? Food shop with a family is not feasible with the weather and roads here. Vegan too so a lot bulkier. Tins, bottles of juice, fruit and veg, dog food, etc. it barely fits in the car.

Move furniture about all the time, last week I took my garden furniture to my SILs for a party she is having.

Away doing something most weekends yes, kids demand it. Can’t exactly put the pram on a bike either so even with great public transport the weather makes doing anything without shelter unpractical.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 22 hours ago (18 children)

Heavier or more awkward than you can comfortably carry. Weekly/monthly food shop, furniture, weekend getaways, etc.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

Well yes that is what I was referencing. That is how many people use them; out at restaurants, public places, at friends, etc. Often they are watching TV on them anyway.

But outwith that they have a whole host of problems even when used correctly and little upside. Autoplay, bright colors, fast-paced and visually rich interfaces. Locked in 20cm from the screen. Instead of learning to entertain yourself quietly. Engaging with your other senses.

Exception is well developed education apps for cognitive impairments, developmental delays, etc where the crazy engagement the design envokes can be useful.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

It’s not a feature that’s implemented, just an idea. I did see something similar floating around as a proposal last year though

 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/26927259

Summary

Idaho teacher Sarah Inama is defying her school district’s order to remove classroom posters promoting inclusivity, including one stating, "Everyone is welcome here."

The district claims the signs violate a policy requiring "content-neutral" decorations and argues that classrooms should be "distraction-free" environments.

Inama initially removed them but later rehung them, arguing the only opposing view to inclusion is exclusion.

Legal counsel upheld the district’s stance, giving her until the school year’s end to comply. Inama refuses, risking her job, and has received widespread support from the community and educators nationwide.

 
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ca/post/40467783

 

cross-posted from: https://lemm.ee/post/56239029

 

cross-posted from: https://ponder.cat/post/1724337

The Associated Press sued three Trump administration officials Friday over access to presidential events, citing freedom of speech in asking a federal judge to stop the 10-day blocking of its journalists.

 

cross-posted from: https://ponder.cat/post/1721021

 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/25879017

Summary

Fox News and Newsmax joined 40 news organizations in signing a letter urging the Trump administration to lift its ban on the Associated Press (AP) from White House events.

The ban stems from AP's refusal to adopt the term "Gulf of America" instead of "Gulf of Mexico," following a Trump executive order.

Newsmax defended AP’s First Amendment rights despite ideological differences.

The White House Correspondents’ Association and the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press also protested the ban, but Trump remains firm, calling AP a "radical left organization."

view more: next ›