brian

You rang?

what

Addendum:

They were too young and a bunch were sick, they were forced to get older puppies, who then also got sick.

They fucked up, got told they fucked up, then fucked up again.

I got that same impression. Like this isn't a matter of belief, it's whether or not people are rejecting facts.

10k hours of actual drinking fluids seems pretty absurd, to be honest. Like I'll throw out random numbers of 30 seconds to drink 8 oz of water. That means to make 10k hours you'd have drank 9.6 million oz of fluids.

That's 75k gallons. That seems a bit excessive.

I would wager that bat species has been around longer than jelly donuts.

Someone just really wanted to snack on that bat

Hm. I'd be interested in seeing anything backing that up. You've just broadly stated that "ineffective" tax policies don't work well, and I feel that is sorta in the name. Is there any line of reasoning that would make "wealth taxes" ineffective?

People who have been in a career for a long time often have no fucking clue what they're doing.

Also related, there is rarely a perfect way to accomplish something. People talk about being cogs in a wheel, but that's pretty insincere when each cog is shaped differently. The way one might approach a task will nearly always be different, and that is pretty liberating, for me.

I don't know much at all about the EV industry, especially how their technology differs between manufacturers. But does that really matter, strictly speaking? Like the majority of "other" repairs are going to be just as uniform as traditional vehicles; things like tire changes, brakes, suspension, and whatever else I'm not smart enough to know about.

Other than the actual engine itself, can that other stuff really be fully proprietary, or non-servicable?

EDIT: I'm realizing that I didn't really clarify the distinction of "should" vs "does". I recognize that a huge amount of right to repair bullshit comes from companies being intentionally obtuse/greedy. What I meant to question was whether these restrictions on serviceability actually have merit, or if it's strictly enshittification being brought into the auto world.

I thought being religiously motivated also would qualify as a hate crime? Or is the implication that one's religion is also immutable?

Truthfully, it's far from relevant that the kid is autistic.

If you drag a child by the ankle, especially as a teacher, you're a 100% piece of shit.

While the original certainly has an actual style, i have to say that I have no fucking clue what I'm looking at with the trump face