byte1000

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago

I miss the random server option.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Q: Why do I have to enable Google Password Manager as an additional provider in order to make it work on Android?

 

Is there a fork of Android (or a way to harden it) that locks down the OS similarly to how Apple does it?

Apple's implementation can actually protect you from commercial spyware. I'm impressed.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

All internet connections into and out of your Linux device will now be blocked unless a VPN connection to a Proton VPN server is active.

If I understand correctly, before version 4.2.0 (that includes the Advanced setting), the kill switch wasn't active until you opened the ProtonVPN program. So if you restarted you PC, it was connecting to the internet without going through the VPN tunnel, so your traffic was somewhat exposed.

Now, with the new permanent kill switch, there's no internet access without running ProtonVPN.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I'm glad you've edited you're blog post so now the country of Qatar is mentioned, which was not the case before. At least there's some progress here.

But I believe that your description of the situation is currently still misleading, especially the title "Israel funded Hamas". Again, it might just be a language issue, but It seems like your claim is that Israel took money from its own budget, and gave it to Hamas (directly or indirectly). If that's actually you're claim, there's no source you've cited that actually says that. Is that your claim? Please correct me if I'm wrong.

It's hard for me to tell if you've actually addressed the point I was making, because all you did is adding quotations. So I don't know if you've accepted my correction that it was not Israeli money nor US tax payers’ money, but in fact was Qatari money, just as your sources say.

So to be clear, I'm not arguing about the fact that Netanyahu's strategy was to allow Qatari money to be handed to Hamas in Gaza, for the purpose of preventing peace talks with Fatah's Palestinian Authority. That is obviously true.

[11] Haaretz:

It’s important to remember that without those funds from Qatar (and Iran), Hamas would not have had the money to maintain its reign of terror, and its regime would have been dependent on restraint.

In practice, the injection of cash (as opposed to bank deposits, which are far more accountable) from Qatar, a practice that Netanyahu supported and approved, has served to strengthen the military arm of Hamas since 2012.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I support the idea of the use of Monero as digital cash. So obviously I'm against the attempt to ban Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies.

English isn't my native language, but I find that your description of the Israel-Hamas situation is misleading. In the same article that you cite, it clearly says that Hamas received money from the Qatari government, that's where the suitcases full of cash came from. It was not Israeli money nor US tax payers' money. The ones funding terror are Qatar and Iran.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago

Good to know. Thank you for your answers!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

Cool.

And what about identifiable and personal information? Such as physical address, phone number, full name etc? Is there any requirement to provide it to you or them?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago (4 children)

When you say there's no KYC, does it mean that you don't require it or that both you and the card provider don't require KYC?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

Yes, I've never used it with Coinbase. I don't live in the US, and I don't think Coinbase is even available in my country.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Moon/PayWithMoon was way better, convince me otherwise.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 years ago (3 children)

You mean Pixel 5.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 years ago (6 children)

If an app on one device connects to an app on another via Veilid, it shouldn't be possible for either client to know the other's IP address or location from that connectivity, which is good for privacy, for instance. The app makers can't get that info, either.

Is that considered a new thing? I don't think I've ever encountered a P2P service/protocol that also masks IP addresses.

 

Does Pleroma have a system for verification that is similar to the one Mastodon has?

And if it has nothing like that, is anyone actively developing it?

20
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
view more: next ›