curbstickle

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 day ago

Since the recent UK court ruling is absolutely not applicable to this situation, and they've given no other reasoning for a decision being delayed on this matter, I don't feel it would be reasonable for the comments to still be up.

100% agreed.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago

You first have to be aware that they exist (they are)

Agreed

then you have to be aware that a specific phrase is one

They were informed, yes. Whether they knew before or not isn't known, but also irrelevant at this point.

you'd have to verify that the report is one

Negative. They are aware the phrase is a dogwhistle. The user realizing that or not is no longer relevant. Remove and notify of the reason.

and then decide what to do about it

Adhere to rule 1 of their instance.

Moderation does not have to be instant.

When the admin is on, available, responds, then stops responding but continues to make comments/posts..... Question answered. They decided against moderating.

I don't believe anyone said anything about "instant". What was said was they went unresponsive.

I agree with you that a comment using that dogwhistle needs to be removed

It IS a dogwhistle.

Whether a user realizes that or not is irrelevant to moderation.

As in, was the delay at the time of the post reasonable.

Not remotely relevant at this point.

  1. Admins were aware
  2. Admins understand and agree its a dogwhistle
  3. Admins chose not to address and stopped communicating while continuing to do other things on the instance.

Not "We're figuring it out", just.... Radio silence.

No, sorry, not relevant at all.

I believe that they were still well within the range of an acceptable time frame for a policy decision on an unfamiliar dogwhistle.

Not without saying as much. And that has nothing to do with their reasoning - they agree its a dog whistle.

[–] [email protected] 58 points 1 day ago (4 children)

I was curious what firm, looks like he is the founder of Madison Park Capital Advisors.

Disturbingly, he was VP of the Public Justice Foundation.

He also was the CFO for UN Peacekeeping where he developed a school for young women in Gaza. I'd say this should be investigated, but with Israel doing a genocide, who knows if those ladies are around to tell their story.

He's also been involved with the Bronx Opera Children's program.... So seems like something else that should be looked into.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

Terrible, I unfortunately don't do a great impersonation of being all about the genocide.

That said, if there were any direct contact information, while I would expect individuals to be ignored, a large amount of direct response would be visible. I've already used the contact form, and have my letter written to go out today (not as concise as yours, so I may tweak it).

Just trying to find every avenue possible.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 day ago

I'm not sure there is any nuance there.

Rule 1 for feddit.uk is explicitly against transphobia. The comment was transphobic and against the rules and should have been removed.

The UK Supreme Court ruling is, as you said, blatantly transphobic.

So they have two options:

  • Adhere to their own rules
  • Drop rule #1 and be OK with transphobic comments.

Regardless of the excuse (and I will not call it "reason", because it is just an excuse at best IMO) the only option for blahaj would be to defederate. Feddit.uk has, in their lack of moderation of transphobic comments, chosen option 2.

At present, feddit.uk is totally cool with transphobia.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I should have pointed out the mail as well, so thank you.

I more meant direct contact to individuals such as Ken Martin.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 day ago (4 children)

It would require that admin to explain their decision going against established policy

The first rule:

No racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia or xenophobia

It would be entirely under that first rule to remove it. There is nothing to explain other than "Rule 1".

So I will firmly disagree. This was not only a communication problem, but a complete lack of moderation by their own rules. There is no way to allow the comment without them changing the rule.

Leaving that comment up is and was implicit support for the comment by saying it was not against the rules.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 2 days ago (6 children)

There is only one part I don't agree with...

.uk didn't do anything wrong as an instance.

Inaction is also an action. I read that inaction as implicit support, regardless of any statements otherwise.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Any options for sending them a message aside from the DNC contact form?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago

Re: #2

The total video should be long. But as a collection of 5-10s videos that are entirely different scenes, and consist of 1-2 thrusts followed by a moan.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Thats about $500 I think? Seems pretty low for the typical ransom approach.

Maybe they charge $150/row for their storage services :)

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 days ago

Another for Mealie.

I mostly use it to import recipes, though some more complicated ones (or ones that I'm tweaking a bit) I'll take pictures, which is handy for tracking the cha yes I've made.

I dont do any major meal planning with it though, most of our shopping are just kitchen staples and whatever looks good/is a good price that day.

 

TL;DR: Want to use my desktop keyboard/mouse with my Laptop. What software are you using/enjoying? Arch+KDE w/ Wayland will be the main host, main client is Windows 11. Secondary hosts may be Debian and MacOS, same client, but low priority on the Mac.

Hey folks, I'm rearranging some things a bit at home, would love to get some current thoughts on keyboard/mouse sharing over IP (no video).

I have to put up with some tools that don't play nicely with wine/proton, and so my work laptop is a windows device. I'll be controlling that device primary from Arch and Debian, though MacOS is a possibility. I'd like to keep the laptop closed and not add another mouse/keyboard into the mix, so Keyb/Mouse over IP it is.

Here's what I'm looking at, haven't tried them all yet, but looking for opinions:

  • Barrier - Dead fork. Hasn't been updated in some time, being superseded by input-leap. Most portions of the project managed by someone who had not been active for a couple years before the Input Leap fork.
  • Input Leap - Forked from Barrier at the end of 2021, and nearly 3 years later, no stable binary releases yet. Development seems fairly active, but no binary releases yet doesn't provide a massive amount of confidence that it will be stable. Doesn't mean I won't build and test though.
  • Lan Mouse - Seems pretty neat, the lack of input capture on MacOS could create an issue for me in certain situations, but I can work around that if I need to for the rare times I'd need it. Traffic is unencrypted/plaintext. Its entirely local, and I've got more security than most users (and some companies), but still. Probably leading the pack right now.
  • Deskflow - Upstream project for Synergy, a rename to differentiate the user project from Synergy. TONS of recent activity, but the switch is very recent. I don't know if there are any binaries built, but its a longstanding project (and like many, many others, I used Synergy before it went commercial, it was nice).

Any other options out there? Good/bad experiences with any of these?

 

I got my hands on a Lenovo ThinkSmart Hub 500 - you may have seen these in conference rooms, its a small Teams Room or Zoom Room device, based off their Tiny lineup, with a built-in touch display thats about 11" in diagonal.

https://psref.lenovo.com/syspool/Sys/PDF/ThinkSmart/ThinkSmart_Hub_500/ThinkSmart_Hub_500_Spec.pdf

I left the 128gb nvme in there for now, and threw Debian 12 on it. Touch worked throughout the installation process, all I did was attach a keyboard, power, and network (along with the thumb drive with netinstall), now installed with KDE.

Considering the specs, the only part I'm surprised works well is the touchscreen, its otherwise just a generic lenovo tiny (which I have several of already, 6th-9th gen, as part of my tiny/mini/micro server stack). I could have chosen a different flavor, but I'm a long, long, loooonngggg time Debain user so its my go-to.

In terms of touch, tap, drag, and long press are all working. Video looks good with the UI set at 125% scaling, and to be candid its rather snappy and responsive.

I did this 100% for my own personal entertainment, so now for some thoughts for the community - what would be fun to use it for? A few of my thoughts....

  • I could use it as a HomeAssistant kiosk. Neat, but.... overkill compared to the tablets doing the same job.
  • Make it an emulation station, attach my steam controller and maybe my usb adapters for N64/GC/Sega/PS/etc.
  • Use it to test a series of distributions to see how well they handle touch drivers for this silly thing (EndeavorOS is probably going to happen, I may be a long time Debian guy but I should spend more regular time in other things, and not just my arch VMs).
  • I don't know, gcompris for my kids? They already have it though on an android tablet and an old mac mini (like, 2011ish) hooked up to the TV in the living room.
  • Make it another proxmox endpoint for the cluster, install a DE anyway, and then let it be an always-visible display for grafana?
  • Install OBS, let the hdmi capture have some purpose?

What about you folks, what would you find fun to do with this box?

18
eBook Library Structure (lemmy.dbzer0.com)
submitted 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

TL;DR: How do you sort your books for your book server?


I'm thinking of reworking my eBook/comic/etc library, and I'm curious how other people structure things.

I don't want to separate fiction out by genre or anything since some can fit multiple genres, so I'm leaning towards Dewey decimal system categories personally.

I'm also planning a bit ahead since my daughter is now starting to read more than sight words books, so I'm thinking of separating kids fiction and adult fiction.

I also currently have a section for comics, manga, and LNs. Those are separated mostly for who goes to what, and what they do/don't want to read. So my library right now (plus the kids section) will look like:

  • Kids Fiction
  • Adult Fiction
  • Comics
  • Manga
  • Light/Web Novels
  • Non-Fiction

Simple for navigation, and searchable, but maybe not the best for browsing. So I was thinking maybe the Dewey categories:

  • Computer Science, Knowledge, and Systems
  • Philosophy & Psychology
  • Social Sciences
  • Language
  • Science
  • Technology
  • Arts
  • Adult Fiction
  • Kids Fiction
  • History/Geography

Nicely browsable, but some of those sections will be really light on books.

What method of sorting do you use? Any librarians out there with thoughts on better approaches than the Dewey decimal system?

EDIT: I really like what @[email protected] mentioned, which I've currently adapted to:

  • Instructional (How-to, manuals, gardening, etc)
  • Tech (Electronics reference materials, programming reference books, etc).
  • Equine (all my wife's horse stuff)
  • Kids Fiction
  • Kids Non-Fiction (I've got some geography books and such my daughter likes, I'm sure it will expand over time)
  • Adult Fiction
  • Adult Non-Fiction
  • Comics
  • Manga
  • LN/WN

I can easily allow the kids accounts to have access to the Kids section, not include the comics/manga/tech my wife has no interest in, etc.

view more: next ›