dysprosium

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (6 children)

But cold water is also continuously flowing in. And as someone said, it perhaps cools down quickly. Is that all and all enough for such a dense vapor cloud to appear as in pic?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (16 children)

Could you name one thing that would cause heat under streets? It's kinda hard to believe tbh

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

Apparently xrel.to doesn't always have films listed, IMDb does. I couldn't even find Boefje

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Why not in her own vagina. Does the other make more sense somehow?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago (7 children)

Explain further please

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago

There seems to be a pretty universal consensus view in leftist spaces that pejoratives based on marginalized groups are a form of microaggression and/or discrimination towards that group and should therefore be avoided. I'm wondering if you disagree with that general principle,

Yeah I guess so. No need to walk on egg shells just to live a little.

or do you just have a problem with the word "retarded" being included in the set of problematic pejoratives?

Both?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 4 months ago (5 children)

How did he dodge the lawsuit

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Ok moral agent of the status quo

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago (5 children)

Way out of line dude. Stop imposing your morality as the gospel. And you again misinterpret what I said. Who is gonna be the arbiter of what words are harmful? That line can be a slippery slope.

And the use of retarded was directed at something, not someone, in case you missed that.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago (7 children)

I feel like you have the impression I lean towards a radical view of free speech, but I have not alluded to that. So hold your horses. I simply stated I was hesitant to donate to an instance that banned users based on the use of the r-word. I wasn't looking for an alternative, I simply talked about an idea I have had.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago (9 children)

That's not the kind of filter I'm talking about. I mean that all content in still there and accessible (to everyone) but only hidden depending on user's settings/preference. This should not require manual labor, if filter is functional enough. That way it's not outright removed, preventing said consequences of potential biased censorship.

I'm not saying said filter is easily implementable but theoretically it'd be the best solution I think.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago (11 children)

Perhaps a filter on the user side is better than to outright censor things. Then you preserve the free flow of ideas and opinion, while limiting unwanted exposure to uninterested people. That way you eliminate the biases of what is deemed permissible and what not. I think that is a good solution for both sides

view more: ‹ prev next ›