evilcultist

joined 3 months ago
[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago

I can’t either. But at some point I stopped punching in dreams and started tearing things in half like they’re made of paper. No gore involved.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Honestly, I don’t want age signals sent at all. As long as I (the parent) can use parental controls to limit app access, that’s all that matters. Give users the option to deny ad personalization and that protects children from ad personalization. Companies don’t need to know anyone’s age. Meta is pushing for more data, but this feels like an underhanded way to take a middle road that gives Google more data (but not as much as Meta wants). We should take the high road and tell them both to butt out.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago

The site is also set up so users get recommended images to pin to their own boards. What’s not clear is that when that happens, Pinterest seems to assume some sort of shared ownership. So if the original image is removed, anyone that pinned it is suddenly counted as the new owner.

I had pinned images to one of my boards that I used to keep a board of art that I liked, thinking it was like bookmarking. Then I started getting emails saying I had violated copyright because Pinterest couldn’t tell the difference between me pinning something it recommended that I pin and me uploading an image.

I went into my boards and saw that some of the art I had pinned (I uploaded nothing) had changed to look as though I was the original uploader and/or owner.

I deleted everything and quit the site after that.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

They’re just trying to scare people enough into having a reaction or admitting fault. Someone could also fail because they are afraid they will fail or they’re afraid they’re a suspect. If the actual leaker ~~thinks they’re doing the right thing and~~that the poly can’t catch them, they probably won’t even have a reaction.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

93% vs 77% doesn’t strike me as polarized. 16% difference?

77% doesn’t even seem that bad if it’s a style of game I like. From about 2001 I used to see sci fi movies that looked interesting as long as they had at least a 25% Rotten Tomatoes score because my tastes were different.

Is there something I’m missing? I haven’t played either game and I haven’t looked at reviews. Won’t buy KCD (no character creation) and probably will eventually buy Avowed.

[–] [email protected] 62 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Sure sounds like Musk is ordering firings, despite the article I saw today saying it’s up to the cabinet and DOGE only makes recommendations.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 month ago

Same. I’ll be shopping around for something else when my sub comes up.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Looking forward to the inevitable news story about DOGE frantically trying to rehire contractors to find missing satellites that they didn’t realize were important. I hope they have to give everyone a raise.

(But, seriously, all the best and fuck Elon)

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Five accomplishments in the last week being used to justify entire position? Yeah, that makes a lot of sense.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)
 
view more: next ›