Didn't he buy twitter with a loan backed by his Tesla stock?
If that's the case and the price is falling enough then the bank could/have called that in. Resulting in the forced sale of his stock.
Which would be very funny.
Snapping sounds like a real faff.
Keep them all in a special plastic box that is inside a powerful electromagnet.
Push button and a field that is strong enough to damage the cards almost instantly and over a short time would generate enough heat to physically damage the cards.
With enough power and time you could turn them into one hot blob that wouldn't even be recognisable.
So near instant data damage and then physical destruction probably before someone can work out what's going on.
My opinion is that it isn't. If it can remove heat then it will cool the same as air AC.
However it comes with the problem of condensation everywhere. So those room radiators that give off heat in the winter will be dripping with condensation in the summer. As will all the system pipework that isn't fully insulated and protected.
So that's probably a lot of water running different places in the home.
You're a bit confused about buffer tanks. They are thermal stores and just store primary heating circuit water.
The water from the buffer tank isn't the hot water from the tap. The water in the buffer tank will be used to indirectly heat mains water. Either through a plate heat exchanger or an unvented cylinder.
What I don't understand about this is why it matters if it's just the USA.
Tintin is Belgian. So almost certainly published there first and covered under their copyright law. I've no idea what that is but just because it expires in the USA can't mean it's just an intentional free-for-all.
Wouldn't the work still be covered in Belgium and any reuse anywhere would leave people liable to legal action there?
The major issue I had with this is that it plays into the alpha male misogynistic ideal of strength.
Some of them will almost certainly see it as a badge of honour. That they are so dominant that some stupid women (their opinion) will misinterpret that and get into trouble with a bear.
I was trying to come up with a way to rephrase it.
Something like would you rather be alone with a man or separate but you both have to eat a bowl of dog shit.
If women choose the bowl there are nasty consequences for both and it's clearer they would rather deal with that than the man.
Nowhere near as catchy though...