gazter

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 weeks ago

It's no longer accessible from a desktop, only from the Google Maps app.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago

Agreed, but your point will usually be a lot better received if you aren't a dick. SpaceX is a great example- it's a great company, but the head of the company taints the whole thing they are trying to achieve.

It comes down to respect. Even if I'm wrong, treating me with respect will mean I'm more likely to respect you, and if I respect you I'm going to respect your argument.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

You're absolutely right, you absolute fuckwad, and well said, even if you are a shit eating waste of a human.

(Sorry I don't mean it, I feel bad now...)

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 weeks ago (8 children)

You've got good points, but your needless insults makes your argument fall on deaf ears.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago

You raise some good points.

I'm not so sure about the US just walking straight over the Iranian army, though. I'm no history buff, but from my brief research the US has not had a great record of winning wars in the last fifty years without massive support from other countries. I highly doubt that the international community will support the US invading Iran in the same way that it did Iraq or Libya.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Sticky rice and a plain omelette with Maggi seasoning. Top tier breakfast.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Ok I'll take this as my opportunity to rant about a pet peeve.

Wearing a harness in this style of elevating work platform is more dangerous than not wearing one, and having a requirement to do so is part of what's wrong with work health and safety.

The only way someone falls out of this, beyond mechanical failure or tipping, is if they lean so far over the railing they fall out of it.

If I need to wear a harness in this, you need to wear one whenever you walk next to a balcony.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

The router is set as a subnet router, that is how I am able to access other machines on my lan remotely.

I don't want to, and sometimes can't, install tailscale on every device I want remote access to.

So I may have duplicate routes- Does that explain the behaviour in my original post? And how would I go about avoiding that?

I could turn off subnet routing, and only turn it on when needed, but I'll be putting up a bunch of other services that will want to talk to each other- I'm assuming this will break whenever I turn subnet routing on.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (4 children)

I kind of follow what you're putting down.

I am not using an exit node. How do I go about splitting my routes?

What I want to achieve is 'normal' access for within the lan, as well as remote access over tailscale for things I cannot run tailscale on.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I have a commercial VPN, but I am not connected. What tinkering did you have to do?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I set up subnet advertisements by doing tailscale set --advertise-routes=192.168.1.0/24. I did not touch ACL.

The home PC is Windows, the context menu for the tray app give the option to 'use tailscale subnets' which is enabled- I assume this is the equivalent of accepting advertised routes.

From the home PC, tailscale ping 192.168.1.2 returns a pong, from the tailscale IP. tracert fails.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 month ago (16 children)

Linux newb here. What does this mean? My knowledge of systemd is that it is responsible for things like mounting disks and running networking. So does this mean I can ask systemd to grab a new IP address every x hours, even if the machine is asleep?

view more: ‹ prev next ›