behoove
And just like that, Mike Isratel popped into my head to narrate for the rest of your post.
It has nothing to do with the meaning. If your training set consists of a bunch of strings consisting of A's and B's together and another subset consisting of C's and D's together (i.e. [AB]+ and [CD]+ in regex) and the LLM outputs "ABBABBBDA", then that's statistically unlikely because D's don't appear with A's and B's. I have no idea what the meaning of these sequences are, nor do I need to know to see that it's statistically unlikely.
In the context of language and LLMs, "statistically likely" roughly means that some human somewhere out there is more likely to have written this than the alternatives because that's where the training data comes from. The LLM doesn't need to understand the meaning. It just needs to be able to compute probabilities, and the probability of this excerpt should be low because the probability that a human would've written this is low.
I don't think we would've had so many lessons on this in school if it didn't need to be taught.
Have people just completely forgot how search engines work? If you search for two things and get shit results, it means those two things don't appear together.
A sentence saying she had her ovaries removed and that she is fertile don't statistically belong together, so you're not even getting that.
So is it sort of like shooting your self the foot long term?
I'm not sure what you're referring to here. Masking or not masking? I would say that masking all the time would qualify as shooting yourself in the foot long term. It's a lot of wasted energy that could be spent doing something else. When you get sufficient time to turn off and relax, it really does feel like autism is a superpower.
To avoid exhaustion and burnout
About three times per day during the work day makes for ~800 times per year. Seems to be on the right order of magnitude to me.
It allows you to compare between different package sizes for the same product, but not between different products. Our goal here is to compare different products.
Added Nesquik to the table.
if you make that kind of analysis with anything at Costco you are always going to buy the thing at Costco, which is the fundamental trade off of Costco, giving up variety for good prices on large quantities.
This kind of analysis just tells you what the costs are. If price is all you care about, then sure, you'll just get everything at Costco. But usually, there's much more at play than just price. This would tell you how much you're paying for the other things you might care about, thus enabling you to make a decision on whether or not it's worth it.
Would it be? When you buy food, it's usually either for the nutrition content, satiety, or flavour. Absolute mass doesn't correlate with any of these as far as I'm aware. How would you use this value?
view more: next ›
Recovery time can vary a lot depending on the person, the particular muscle group how much volume you do, how hard you push, quality of your sleep, and a bunch of other factors. It's not wild to have arms that recover faster than average.
It's perfectly valid to have a fluctuating schedule too. It's not ideal, but life rarely cooperates to give us ideal conditions. I'd say that if changing it to a fixed schedule is too complicated or makes it less enjoyable and harder to adhere to, then don't do it. Based on what you've written, it seems like you do have a pretty well thought out plan on how to autoregulate and adapt to whatever your work schedule throws at you. That is in itself a rigorous plan. Not everything has to align with our seven day calendars.