I think their argument is that the tax revenue is still owed, whether it's collected or not. So the IRS could absolutely get back on track post Trump and pursue these unpaid taxes.
hydrospanner
Mysterious ways, I tells ya!
Y'know... I'd have found all this "coconuts floated from Asia to the Caribbean" stuff pretty far fetched...
But not two years ago I was fishing, and a goddamn coconut floated right down and bumped me in the leg.
In the Monongahela River.
In Pittsburgh.
I'm starting to think maybe the username isn't just a username, and the account is literally for a wall panel to express its views.
Of the entire list, I guess I'd pick Grassley.
At least he's from the old school of partisan bickering.
Remember when Obama wearing a tan suit was enough to keep the right frothing at the mouth for weeks?
Anyone who thinks tariffs will do anything at all positive for the American working class is absolutely clueless.
All they do is make prices jump for consumers. It doesn't put domestic goods at an advantage because the domestic producers of those goods increase their prices artificially to achieve parity with import pricing.
So prices go up for the consumer with the extra money going to either:
- For imported goods, to pay the tariff, a tax, to the government, which in this case wants to use that tax revenue to offset tax cuts for the wealthy.
or
- For domestic goods, it's pure straight profit for the unethical corporations who are price gouging their domestic customer base. They're not giving the consumer a break on price and they're not sharing the profits by giving employees raises. Hell, they're not even taking advantage of the competitive advantage to ramp up production and create jobs. They're just pocketing that extra cash for doing exactly what they're always doing...passing it on to, you guessed it...the wealthy.
Uh...great story?
It wasn't until I saw this pic that I realized that a platypus and a tardigrade look alike.
Which is why we need an update to the tax system to add brackets to cover the entire range of income, then redefine them based on percentages off the median, with the highest bracket set at 95% or more for the highest 5% of earners.
I think you misunderstood them...
Said another way:
"There's an unspoken lack of trust that comes with forcing people to come (back) into an office. Basically, it's the employer telling their employees that they don't trust them to do their work unless management can physically see them at their desks in the office."
Just doesn't feel right to carve up an Ottoman Empire for Thanksgiving.