inlandempire

Daily Akari 😊
Fri Jun 20, 2025
✅Solved in 0:59✅
https://dailyakari.com/

#waffle1245 5/5

🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
🟩⭐🟩⭐🟩
🟩🟩⭐🟩🟩
🟩⭐🟩⭐🟩
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩

🔥 streak: 8
wafflegame.net

From the research paper:

Summary of results

We believe that some of the most striking observations in our study stem from Session 4, where Brain-to-LLM participants showed higher neural connectivity than LLM Group's sessions 1, 2, 3 (network‑wide spike in alpha-, beta‑, theta‑, and delta-band directed connectivity). This suggests that rewriting an essay using AI tools (after prior AI-free writing) engaged more extensive brain network interactions. In contrast, the LLM-to-Brain group, being exposed to LLM use prior, demonstrated less coordinated neural effort in most bands, as well as bias in LLM specific vocabulary. Though scored high by both AI judge and human teachers, their essays stood out less in terms of the distance of NER/n-gram usage compared to other sessions in other groups. On the topic level, few topics deviated significantly and almost orthogonally (like HAPPINESS or PHILANTHROPY topics) in between LLM and Brain-only groups.

Conclusions

As we stand at this technological crossroads, it becomes crucial to understand the full spectrum of cognitive consequences associated with LLM integration in educational and informational contexts. While these tools offer unprecedented opportunities for enhancing learning and 142 information access, their potential impact on cognitive development, critical thinking, and intellectual independence demands a very careful consideration and continued research. The LLM undeniably reduced the friction involved in answering participants' questions compared to the Search Engine. However, this convenience came at a cognitive cost, diminishing users' inclination to critically evaluate the LLM's output or ”opinions” (probabilistic answers based on the training datasets). This highlights a concerning evolution of the 'echo chamber' effect: rather than disappearing, it has adapted to shape user exposure through algorithmically curated content. What is ranked as “top” is ultimately influenced by the priorities of the LLM's shareholders [123, 125]. Only a few participants in the interviews mentioned that they did not follow the “thinking” [124] aspect of the LLMs and pursued their line of ideation and thinking. Regarding ethical considerations, participants who were in the Brain-only group reported higher satisfaction and demonstrated higher brain connectivity, compared to other groups. Essays written with the help of LLM carried a lesser significance or value to the participants (impaired ownership, Figure 8), as they spent less time on writing (Figure 33), and mostly failed to provide a quote from theis essays (Session 1, Figure 6, Figure 7). Human teachers “closed the loop” by detecting the LLM-generated essays, as they recognized the conventional structure and homogeneity of the delivered points for each essay within the topic and group. We believe that the longitudinal studies are needed in order to understand the long-term impact of the LLMs on the human brain, before LLMs are recognized as something that is net positive for the humans.

Thank you!!

Go ahead

I'm not challenging you I'm just looking for recommendations lol

I think he had a precise idea of the feelings he wanted to convey, and those were drowned out by the overall quality of the game, so he felt like people didn't get the message ? Idk just throwing out a hypothesis

Daily Akari 😊
Tue Jun 17, 2025
✅Solved in 0:57✅
https://dailyakari.com/

Maybe they dont have them and cant download them

Those are like the fathers of the French touch

Got the same message since last Wednesday I think, not by trying to access articles, just playing their daily gameson mobile (Firefox)

Hourly minimum wage in France (after taxes) : 9,40€ 💀