julietOscarEcho

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago

Not quite never. You just need the tax rate plus marginal change in lost benefits/increased obligations to exceed 100%. For example there's a breakpoint in the UK around childcare over 100k income that makes it way worth salary sacrificing to get below if you have kids. I can imagine there are similar niche things for small businesses around audit requirements or whatever, but not enough of an expert to know.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 week ago

"God, modernist literary fiction is so plebian." - anon probably.

Next he'll ask for "ulysses" and get mad when pointed to James Joyce instead of Homer.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

Do you think sitting on your arse claiming there's nothing to be done is more or less demoralising than singing in the streets with like minded people?

Maybe you work different than most humans, but I think the answer to that is pretty obvious for the rest of us.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 week ago

US economic output is more than adequate to achieve this already, but we choose instead to concentrate the benefits in the hands of a few.

Regarding tarrifs bringing back manufacturing: https://www.kcl.ac.uk/trumps-tariffs-what-is-behind-them-and-will-they-work "but this is very unlikely to work. Manufacturing has changed, with production now spread across multiple countries in so-called ‘global value chains’. Moving whole supply chains back to the US is going to be prohibitively expensive, result in rising consumer prices and make US-produced goods internationally uncompetitive. The model of manufacturing that underpins Trump’s approach simply hasn’t existed for the best part of 40 years, and is not coming back."

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago

First pass googling this returns very low information quality. I suspect "calculable" is more more like it than "measurable" but would love to see a source where measurements had been made that showed this effect greater than standard error.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago

"If not duffers, won't drown. If duffers, better drowned."

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago

Avoiding Gell-Mann amnesia! Unfortunately, to even get to this question you have to be expert enough in one area to see through the BS... Not a luxury everyone is afforded.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Precisely. If you train by lifting stones you can still use the lever later, but you'll be able to lift even heavier things by using both your new strength AND the leaver's mechanical advantage.

By analogy, if you're using LLMs to do the easy bits in order to spend more time with harder problems fuckin a. But the idea you can just replace actual coding work with copy paste is a shitty one. Again by analogy with rock lifting: now you have noodle arms and can't lift shit if your lever breaks or doesn't fit under a particular rock or whatever.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

If your basket has a big fuck off hole in it stop putting eggs in...

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Thus frames the eggs as the humans and the basket as earth. Could easily flip it and say we are stewards of one planet and if we fuck up so catastrophically we have to leave maybe our arrival wouldn't be the best idea for the next habitable planet we land on...

[–] [email protected] 15 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Wow, that was their takeaway from that game? I honestly didn't think about it once the whole playthrough, why are they so desperate to role play racism/sexism?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I can't help comparing it (unfavourably) to baldurs gate 1. The story just didn't hook me the same way.

1
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

Today I received in the post a kit I had bought already. I think this is the acid test for unpainted models. If you can remember everything you have yet to paint you're good. Above that is verboten for me now.

Anyone else have a rule of thumb to keep themselves in check?

 

I made an inpromptu stop in silverknowles today and it was fucking delightful. Amazing live music and a shady spot to enjoy refreshments. Can't recommend enough.

 

Michael Howard today (on BBC radio 4):

The point about public ownership is this: if you have the industry in public ownership, it has to compete for resources with health, with education, with the police, with all the other legitimate demands on the public purse, and water when it was in public ownership was way down the queue.

People pay water rates Michael. This is an income bearing asset that could have supported other public programs. Instead it's been used to enrich the already wealthy at the expense of underinvestment in infrastructure, callous polluting, and the risk of damaging bancruptcy.

When you release it into the private sector, you have recourse to private capital. You can make the investment that’s needed.

Errr. Except a PLC's cost of capital is higher than the cost of govornment debt, so any investment is going to be harder to make and ultimately will cost the public more. As evidenced by the fact that they have done exactly the opposite of "make the investment that’s needed" over the past 30 years.

Dear god, he can't possibly be actually that dense. I have to assume he, and by extension his party that continues to support this stupid idea, is acting in bad faith.

 

I have my gripes but I agree with all of these. Looking forward to my first game next week!

 

I don't love free wargear (because there will inevitably better or worse options when everything is a straight swap whereas with points cost you can balance finely), but I can see that it makes life easier.

Fixed unit sizes, however, are supremely shit. All in all totally ripped the variety out of list building, which was one of my favourite things about the game. Lists now will look mostly identical.

 

Enjoying what we've seen so far from the rules, if a bit disappointed by some of the loss of flexibility.

 

Come say hi packer backers.

view more: next ›