le_pouffre_bleu

joined 2 years ago
 

Un neutrino de très haute énergie a été détecté en Méditerranée par le télescope de la collaboration internationale KM3NeT. Cette découverte qui a fait la couverture de Nature marque une avancée significative dans la compréhension des phénomènes énergétiques extrêmes de l’Univers et bouscule les modèles astrophysiques actuels.

Explications avec Thierry Pradier, enseignant-chercheur à l’Institut pluridisciplinaire Hubert-Curien (IPHC - Unistra/CNRS) et membre de la collaboration, impliqué dans la construction des détecteurs à neutrinos du télescope qui ont rendu possible cette observation.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

So what does is change about the facts in this article? If know about her, I guess you known about the social cleansing that happened in Paris, so why just focus on her instead of the subject ?

she does more hurt to her community than anything.

Funny enough, this critic is mostly made from people outside "her community"...

[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago (3 children)

What's wrong ?

 

this unifying narrative introduced an Olympic and Paralympic Games that in reality are not all that inclusive. (...) To make these Games happen, Paris had to undertake a programme of intense social cleansing.

According to an investigation by a collective named Le revers de la médaille (The other side of the coin), 12,545 people (including 3,434 minors) were evicted – some of them forcibly – across the Paris region between April 2023 and May 2024, which is a 38.5% increase on the 2021-22 period (twice as many as last year, and almost three times more than in 2021-22 for the minors)
(...)
Another odious policy that has accompanied preparations for the Olympics and Paralympics is that homeless people have been hidden or driven away by such measures as the installation of anti-homeless urban furniture. Almost 1,000 students were forced to vacate their university accommodation (provided by the official student services organisation) for police officers, firefighters and healthcare workers on duty during the Games. Many of them reported their shock at being met by utterly squalid conditions, including cockroaches, mould and mice. In addition to the filth, what is shocking is that it has taken the Olympics to expose the living conditions of students, despite repeated denunciation by their unions. (...)

The surveillance extends well beyond QR codes. The legalisation of algorithmic surveillance, which allows for real-time behaviour analysis using AI to anticipate supposedly suspicious acts, is a “violation of the right to privacy”, according to Amnesty International. This system, fuelled by human biases against certain populations, will be amplified. Moreover, it will persist beyond the Olympic Game.

 

The influence of the Atlas Network – a web of libertarian and ultraconservative think tanks funded by billionaires such as the Kochs – has been well documented in the US, the UK, and more recently Argentina following the election of Javier Milei. Its growing presence in the EU has been less examined. But the next EU elections could deliver a political landscape even more favourable to their ideas. This article takes a look at some of the Atlas Network’s partners in Brussels and their activities.

(...) To “change the climate of ideas”, the Atlas Network and its partners use a range of influence strategies that sometimes involve manipulation, such as offering falsely neutral expertise or ‘astroturfing’. With these methods, the Atlas Network’s partners have scored important political victories all over the world: spreading climate denialism, influencing referendum outcomes (the Voice in Australia, the referendum on the Chilean constitution, Brexit, etc.) and electing Javier Milei in Argentina. British journalist Georges Monbiot recently asked in The Guardian: “What links Rishi Sunak, Javier Milei and Donald Trump?” Answer: the Atlas Network.

(...)

Just as it has in Argentina, in France, and around the world (read our recent investigation in French), the Atlas Network supports, nurtures and promotes its partners throughout Europe. Wherever its influence is felt it promotes a ranch of ultra free market policies that inevitably involve tax cuts for the rich, slashing public spending, massive deregulation, and opposition to climate justice, backed by well-resourced but mostly hidden funders. The politics it is promoting in Europe are no exception, and reflect a similar alliance between extreme neoliberal policies and radical conservative causes, as seen in the US .

(...) Free Trade Europa: labour rights as a “violation of freedoms”?

Although verbal violence is not uncommon on X (formerly Twitter), it is unusual to see a lobbyist publicly rejoicing at the failure of an EU Council Presidency initiative. And even less praising other Member States for giving the Spanish government a ’bloody nose’ when it failed to find a consensus on a law giving employment rights to platform workers [29]. Yet that is exactly what Free Trade Europa did, amply demonstrating the extent to which, at the end of December 2023, on the issue of the legal status of platform workers, two diametrically opposed visions of the world were clashing.

It was in particular Emmanuel Macron’s France that, in alliance with Estonia, Greece and Germany, defeated the platform workers directive, and Glen Hodgson – head of Free Trade Europa – seems to be congratulating them in his tweet. The initial draft directive drawn up by the European Commission offered the possibility for platform workers – so, people making deliveries for Deliveroo, driving for Uber, etc – to claim the status of employees with the corresponding social rights, which they do not enjoy under a self-employed or freelance status: accident insurance, paid holidays, a minimum wage and union representation. The law was approved after a long lobbying battle [30], but then blocked at the last minute at the Council of the EU, at the behest of France in particular. It was eventually greenlighted in an even more watered-down version in March.

(...) After the final vote on the European law on platform workers, Glen talked with Pieter Cleppe, a journalist close to Flemish far-right party the NVA, and castigated the European Union for “regulating, regulating, regulating”. Free Trade Europa is one of a growing number of members of the Atlas Network in Brussels who are determined to roll back regulation, and are counting on the forthcoming European elections and the rise of the right and far right to find more allies in the institutions. The experience of the directive on platform workers shows that on certain issues they can also find common ground with liberals and some EU governments, particularly that of France.

With far right parties on the rise all over Europe, there are reasons to fear that after the June elections, the EU will tilt further towards a conservative, anti-climate and anti-regulation political agenda. Given the Atlas Network’s decades-long mission of “changing the climate of ideas” and pushing back on social justice and progressive environmental policies it appears to be seeking new allies and more open doors in the EU. With the Europe Liberty Forum which recently took place in Madrid, where 191 organisations from 47 countries were represented, it demonstrated its increased strength in Europe, including in Brussels. After Argentina, the UK, and many other countries, it now has the EU in its sights.

 

Hugo Rochard, https://doi.org/10.4000/developpementdurable.23444

Micro-forest projects are multiplying throughout cities as a new emblem of ecological design of artificial environments. This emerging form of renaturation is bringing a new public narrative investing the discourse of nature based-solutions and civic participation. In Paris, the first micro-forest proposal was carried and implemented by a civic group with the technical and financial support of the municipality. This article analyzes the governance of this nature-based solution through its coproduction, identifying its achievement and challenges on several pilot sites. The analysis shows how a new public narrative is being built from a civic experimentation, while obscuring the difficulties encountered locally by an initiative that faces the territorial complexity of a highly degraded urban environment.

Outline

  1. De l’engouement public pour les micro-forêts urbaines à leur gouvernance

1.1. La constitution d’un nouveau récit d’action publique

1.2. Interroger la gouvernance d’une solution fondée sur la nature

1.3. Question de recherche

  1. Étude de cas d’un projet citoyen de micro-forêts à Paris : une coproduction ?

2.1. Matériel et méthodes d’analyse

2.2. Une solution fondée sur la nature et sur un collectif de citoyens

2.3. Expérimenter collectivement la méthode Miyawaki : une éthique d’action environnementale et citoyenne

2.4. Une gouvernance collaborative entre apprentissages et négociations entre acteurs techniques et citoyens

  1. Discussion

3.1. Un partenariat et des non-dits : les chocs temporels d’une coproduction

3.2. Les défis de l’opérationnalisation : illustration à partir d’un site afforesté

Conclusion

 

Cette archive exceptionnelle est l’une des premières interviews sonores, le premier enregistrement d'un échange spontané, non lu. C’est aussi l’une des rares traces de l’accent parisien d’avant-guerre. En 1912, le linguiste Ferdinand Brunot veut enregistrer les dialectes des artisans. Ici, c’est le parler parisien qui l’intéresse, l’accent populaire des différents quartiers de la capitale. Louis Ligabue, tapissier dans le 14e arrondissement, a alors 37 ans, et note déjà l'embourgeoisement de son quartier.

 

Voici un petit guide pour frauder plus sereinement dans les transports parisiens parce que le prix du métro c’est a-bu-sé, que les transports sont presque indispensables pour se déplacer en IDF et que quelques astuces permettent de réduire pas mal le risque de croiser la sale tête des contrôleur.euses et d’éviter les amendes !

 

Projet de pont routier entre Athis-Mons et Vigneux : les opposants remobilisent leurs troupes

L’association Athis-Pont non ! a tenu une réunion publique mardi soir en Essonne. Objectif : inciter les populations à participer à l’enquête publique en cours sur la révision du Sdrif-e. La commune voisine du Val-de-Marne, Ablon-sur-Seine se joint au mouvement pour protester.

Par Cécile Chevallier Le 8 février 2024 à 06h08

« À vous d'agir. » Après une manifestation en septembre dernier, place aux contributions. Mardi soir, l'association Athis-Pont non ! a tenu à Athis-Mons (Essonne) une réunion publique devant une centaine de personnes. Toujours opposée au projet de franchissement de la Seine entre Athis et Vigneux-sur-Seine via un pont routier de deux fois deux voies, elle incite les populations à participer à l'enquête publique en cours dans le cadre de l'élaboration du Sdrif-e (le schéma directeur de la région Ile-de-France environnemental).

Depuis le 1er février et jusqu'au 16 mars, chacun est amené à donner son avis sur ce document d'aménagement qui déterminera la localisation des grandes infrastructures de transports et des grands équipements pour les prochaines années. « Aujourd'hui, il inclut la création d'un pont routier entre Athis et Vigneux, indique Muriel Josselin, la présidente de l'association. Les quartiers de Mons et de la gare, sur le tracé de cet axe, sont donc particulièrement impactés par ce projet. Si une énième infrastructure routière allait changer la donne en Île-de-France, cela se saurait. »

Déjà des « petites victoires »

Athis-Pont non ! voit en l'enquête publique « une opportunité essentielle pour recueillir les observations des habitants » avant l'adoption définitive de ce schéma prévue pour l'été prochain. « Nous vous invitons à participer pour faire part de votre opposition », exhorte Gautier Conan, adjoint à Athis-Mons et membre de l'association.

Certains ont déjà entendu le message et déposent à la réunion publique leur contribution déjà remplie. L'association les remettra au commissaire-enquêteur, présent en mairie d'Athis-Mons le 6 mars prochain dans l'après-midi.

« N'hésitez pas à venir massivement, suggère Jean-Jacques Grousseau, le maire (PS) d'Athis-Mons. Pas pour le prendre à partie mais pour lui témoigner de votre opposition. Je vois que ce sujet mobilise, vous êtes très nombreux. Nous devons tout faire pour que ce projet ne voie jamais le jour. »

Pour l'élu et l'association, il y a déjà des « petites victoires ». « Après notre mobilisation, la Métropole du Grand Paris a exclu dans son schéma de cohérence territoriale (SCOT) tout franchissement routier sur la Seine entre Athis-Mons et Vigneux-sur-Seine, annonce Muriel Josselin. La vigilance reste de mise car il reste à l'ordre du jour du Sdrif-e, document qui prévaut sur tout le reste. »

Le département se concentre sur le prolongement de la ligne 18

Ce projet de pont, très ancien, a été exhumé par François Durovray (LR) lors de son élection à la présidence du conseil départemental en 2015. L'objectif étant de désengorger le trafic des ponts de Draveil et de Villeneuve-Saint-Georges (Val-de-Marne). L'enquête publique menée en 2019 a suscité une forte opposition des deux rives de la Seine, en Essonne et dans le Val-de-Marne.

« Depuis 2020, nous avons deux éléments positifs, résume Jean-Jacques Grousseau. Trois ans après le vote d'un million d'euros pour des études, pas un centime n'a été encore dépensé. Il faut se mobiliser pour un franchissement, mais en transport en commun. »

C'est la position de François Durovray. Contacté par téléphone, le président du conseil départemental de l'Essonne confirme, comme il le disait déjà en septembre, que « pour le moment, stylo est levé concernant le projet de pont routier ».

« Ma priorité, ainsi que celle de mon homologue du Val-de-Marne, c'estle prolongement vers l'est de la ligne 18 du Grand Paris expressjusqu'à Montgeron (), confie-t-il. Nous avançons sur cette revendication : à la demande de l'Essonne et du Val-de-Marne, des études de faisabilité vont être menées entre Orly et Boissy-Saint-Léger. Des crédits pour le prolongement de ce futur métro ont été inscrits au contrat de plan État-Région 2023-2027. »

C'est « l'unique priorité » de François Durovray. Lors de la réunion publique de mardi soir, Athis-Pont non ! a clairement approuvé cette demande de prolongement. « Nous la soutenons sans ambiguïté », assure Jean-Jacques Grousseau.

Le projet de pont « intimement lié » au projet de port industriel

Outre le projet de pont, la réunion publique est revenue sur le projet de port industriel ressorti récemment des cartons. Haropa Port étudie la possibilité d'installer, sur une emprise de 20 ha, située à Vigneux-sur-Seine et en face de l'écluse d'Ablon-sur-Seine (Val-de-Marne), un port industriel qui intégrerait une production d'hydrogène décarboné.

« Ces deux projets sont intimement liés, estime Ghislain Borrelly, conseiller municipal délégué aux aménagements à Ablon. Si ce port voit le jour, il sera affrété par 1 000 à 1 500 camions par jour, qu'il faudra bien faire évacuer quelque part. À Ablon, nous sommes fermement contre, ainsi que nos voisins de Villeneuve-le-Roi et de Villeneuve-Saint-Georges, tout comme le conseil départemental du Val-de-Marne qui a voté à l'unanimité en décembre dernier une motion contre ce projet de port. »

Ce sujet a réactivé l'association SOS bords de Seine à Ablon. « Ce n'est pas le combat d'un petit village gaulois, assure Claire, la présidente. À Ablon ou Villeneuve-le-Roi, tout comme Athis-Mons ou Vigneux, nous participons déjà à l'intérêt général en supportant beaucoup de nuisances, notamment par les survols d'avions. Nous ne voulons pas de projets qui vont apporter énormément de bruit et des pollutions à nos portes. »

 

‘Symbol of polarisation’: EU scraps plans to halve use of pesticides

The European Commission is shelving plans to cut pesticide use and is taking the pressure off agriculture in its latest emissions recommendations, as farmers around Europe continue protests demanding higher prices for their products and an easing of EU environment rules.

The original proposal to halve chemical pesticide use in the EU by the end of the decade – part of the EU’s green transition – “has become a symbol of polarisation”, said the commission president, Ursula von der Leyen. She added that she would ask the commission to withdraw the proposal.

Separately on Tuesday, the commission recommended that the EU slash net greenhouse gas emissions by 90% by 2040 but without the stipulation from previous drafts that farming would need to cut non-CO2 emissions by 30% from 2015 levels in order to comply.

The moves mark the bloc’s latest environmental concessions to farmers, whose recent protests across Europe in countries including France, Germany, Belgium, the Netherlands, Poland and Greece spread this week to Spain and Italy.

Last week, in response to the protests, the bloc announced plans to limit market disruption from Ukrainian products entering the EU and delayed rules on setting aside more land to promote soil health and encourage biodiversity.

(...)

Protests continued to spread on Tuesday. In Spain, (...) Greek farmers also said on Tuesday they would block motorways and converge on Athens (...) In Italy, farmers from argricultural regions protesting about red tape and cheap non-EU imports have begun converging on Rome (...)

(...) Individual member states have also taken steps to appease angry farmers, with Germany watering down plans to cut diesel subsidies. Meanwhile, Paris is scrapping a planned diesel tax increase and promising more than €400m (£342m) in targeted help.

The task of drafting proposals on pesticide legislation is likely to fall to the next commission. Von der Leyen said on Tuesday they had made little progress over the past two years in the European parliament or the European Council, representing EU member states.

Far-right and anti-establishment parties, which are projected to make major gains in June’s European parliamentary elections, have picked up on farmers’ grievances as part of a wider drive against EU influence, pushing them to the top of the bloc’s agenda. A new commission will be formed after the June vote. (...)

 

Ugandan climate activists face charges after a month in maximum security jail

The 11 university students could be imprisoned for a year for protesting against the East Africa Crude Oil Pipeline Eleven Ugandan climate activists who were allegedly beaten and held arbitrarily in a notorious maximum security prison will appear in court on Wednesday charged with a colonial era anti-dissident offense, as reprisals continue against opponents of an internationally bankrolled oil pipeline.

If convicted, the 11 activists, all university students, face up to a year in jail. Four of them – Nicholas Lutabi, Jacob Lubega, Shafik Kalyango and Abdul Aziz Bwete – were allegedly arrested and beaten by police armed with guns, teargas and batons as they marched peacefully towards parliament in the capital city, Kampala, on 15 December.

They were targeted after becoming separated from a larger protest calling on the Uganda government to stop construction of the East Africa Crude Oil Pipeline (Eacop), a $5bn fossil-fuel project backed by the French conglomerate TotalEnergies and a Chinese national oil company, as well as the governments of Uganda and Tanzania.

The climate activists said they were forced into an unmarked building within the parliament entrance, where the police officers repeatedly kicked, punched and beat them with heavy objects. It is the same place and same abusive treatment reported by at least two dozen anti-pipeline activists over the past two years.

(...)

The arrests came just three weeks after seven activists from another anti-pipeline group, Students against Eacop Uganda, were arrested and detained under similar circumstances, by the same judge. They spent almost four weeks in maximum security and will also appear in court on Wednesday charged with common nuisance. If convicted, they face a custodial sentence of 12 months.

“It is not normal to detain suspects for even a day for a common nuisance charge,” said attorney Ronald Samuel Wanda, who is representing 15 pipeline protesters. “These arrests are arbitrary … Arresting those protesting peacefully demonstrates that the government of Uganda does not respect its own constitution.”

UN experts, the EU and international rights groups have documented those speaking out against the oil pipeline. In September 2022, the European parliament adopted a resolution condemning Eacop for the “wrongful imprisonment of human rights defenders, the arbitrary suspension of NGOs, arbitrary prison sentences and the eviction of hundreds of people from their land without fair and adequate compensation”.

Hanna Hindstrom, senior investigator for the international non-profit Global Witness, which has published an investigation into TotalEnergies activities in the region, said the company had a vested interest in the crackdown on defenders in Uganda and Tanzania, with a “chilling effect on communities affected by the pipeline”.

“These young people are speaking up for the survival of the planet, its communities and ecosystems, and should be heeded, not thrown in jail,” Hindstrom said.

Last year TotalEnergies told the Guardian it was unaware of “any allegations by human rights and environmental defenders of threats or retaliation made by its subsidiary, contractors or employees in Uganda or Tanzania”.

 

Summary of the day [6 Febuary 2024]

The European Commission president, Ursula von der Leyen, said she would suggest withdrawing a plan to reduce pesticides and could propose a different one.

The move is part of Brussels’ gesturing to farmers amid protests across the continent.

The European farming lobby, Copa and Cogeca, welcomed the announcement, writing that the “European Commission is finally acknowledging that the approach was not the right one, and is thereby reinforcing the credibility and importance of the ongoing strategic dialogue.”

The Belgian prime minister, Alexander De Croo, also welcomed the move, saying that it is “crucial we keep our farmers on board to a more sustainable future of farming, as part of our determination to get the Green Deal done. The dialogue continues.”

MEP Alexander Bernhuber, the European People’s Party group’s chief negotiator on pesticides, said that “this is a first good sign that the Commission will work with farmers to tackle climate change rather than against them.”

Green MEP Sarah Wiener said that negotiations on the new pesticides regulation had been stuck for months and that “it is regrettable that it had to come to this, but at the same time this gives us a new opportunity to continue working on the SUR.”

The European Commission today also recommended a 90% net greenhouse gas emissions reduction by 2040 compared to 1990 levels, though the proposal was interpreted as a watered down version of earlier plans due to political pressure linked to farmers’ concerns.

Greenpeace criticised the Commission proposal, arguing that “the absence of a phase-out plan for fossil fuels, and even for subsidies, not only delays the climate action we urgently need, but will end up hurting people more.”

Spanish farmers used WhatsApp groups to stage a series of informal protests today, blocking off major roads around the country to demand fair prices for their produce and a reduction in bureaucracy.

Italian farmers are staging a significant demonstration in Rome this week by driving their tractors around the city, while their colleagues in the north led a cow through the streets of Milan.

Italian senators are to debate plans by the far-right government to decriminalise abuse of office, a decision that has sparked tension with the EU and raised fears over the potential for mafia infiltration in the public sector.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Former US President Donald Trump said: ‘What do you have to lose? Take it.’

As a proud and patriotic French, I can't let the murican brag about their (former) President without bragging about our former and current President whom happen to be a very good epidemiologist :

https://www.science.org/content/article/france-s-president-fueling-hype-over-unproven-coronavirus-treatment

Today his profile rose even higher, as French President Emmanuel Macron traveled to Marseille to meet Raoult, a hospital director and researcher who led the two trials. Macron did not comment after the meeting, but the rendezvous, initiated by Macron, was a clear sign of Raoult's newfound political clout. Jean-Paul Hamon, president of the Federation of Doctors of France, one of many scientists and doctors critical of the meeting, called it "showbiz politics."

A survey released by French polling institute IFOP on 6 April revealed that 59% of the French population believes chloroquine is effective against the new coronavirus. Confidence in the drugs is higher on the far right and far left, and reached 80% among sympathizers of the "yellow vest" movement that staged massive protests against Macron's economic policy in 2018 and 2019. Support is also very high, at 74%, in the Marseille region.

Karine Lacombe, head of infectious diseases at the Saint Antoine Hospital in Paris, has said on French TV that she and her team have received repeated "physical threats" for refusing to prescribe chloroquine; she said she has also seen many falsified prescriptions for the drug. Other doctors have reported similar experiences. The pressure comes on top of the stress caused by shortages of protective equipment, diagnostic tests, and medical staff.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

In my country (France) it's mandatory to have one...

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It's happening here (France) as well. Insurer have cancelled their contract with some cities because it would be to expansive to do what they are paid for...


Pyrénées-Orientales : ces communes qui voient leurs contrats d'assurance résiliés face à la hausse du risque

After dealing with floods, landslides, fires... in recent months, the nightmare has taken another turn for some mayors, many of them in the Pyrénées-Orientales region, who are seeing their insurers suddenly withdraw from their contracts. Faced with unbearable increases or outright cancellations from one day to the next, a veritable marathon has begun for the elected representatives of small communes, who are sweating to find a new insurance company.

It's been around two years since the evil began to creep into municipal councils in the département, as it has in many other parts of France. Some elected representatives no longer hide their fear at the thought of opening a letter from their insurance company. End of contract or not, the bad news can come at any time. There are two phenomena," says Edmond Jorda, president of the Catalan branch of the Association des Maires de France. Either a staggering rise in membership fees. Or the insurance company simply pulls out." On the morning of Monday November 6, the elected representative met with the president of the AMF Occitanie on this subject. "On November 22, this will be the theme of a workshop at the Congress of Mayors in Paris," he informs, "the title of which will be 'Does my commune have an insurer?'"

In fact, the scale of the problem is such that on October 25 the government launched a mission on "the insurability of local authorities". It will have the difficult task of determining how to get local authorities, already overwhelmed by the vagaries of the weather, out of the rut.

Unsuccessful call for tenders

A number of communes in the Pyrénées-Orientales region, particularly on the coast and in the Agly and Têt valleys, have recently received notices of increased premiums, or worse. "Some people have had their insurance withdrawn mid-contract", says Edmond Jorda, although he stresses that this is legal. This is how the mayor of his commune of Sainte-Marie currently finds himself without "ordinary sickness" insurance for his municipal employees. "There are many of us in this situation, and our employees are no longer covered by our insurance except for long-term sick leave, long-term illness or maternity leave." Forcing the communes to compensate out of their own funds.

Not far away, in Torreilles, the municipality is under a double sword of Damocles. "Mayor Marc Médina laments, "Our insurer cancelled our property insurance policy before the summer, on the grounds that we are in a flood zone. The problem is that the call for tenders immediately launched by the commune was unsuccessful. "It's not uncommon for companies not even to reply to our letters," says a disappointed Edmond Jorda. "As soon as we're on a risk prevention plan or listed on a natural disaster decree, the insurers either impose prohibitive rates on us, or don't respond to our requests."

In Torreilles, "we will no longer have insurance as of next January", warns Marc Médina. But that's not all: on the same date, the second insurance company covering the commune and its 70 or so agents for supplementary health insurance will also lapse. "We had a firm that insured us. But in July 2022, they announced that they would be cancelling the contract on January 31. We renegotiated a small increase in the deductible and the contract was maintained. A few weeks ago, however, we received a reminder that our contract would be terminated again on December 31, 2023."

200% increase in municipal contribution

The mayor does not understand this decision. In his view, it was sick leave, which was too high for the insurer's liking, that had justified this "readjustment". But since then, he insists, the situation has largely improved. He thought he was safe from another surprise. The only way out for him was a 200% increase in the municipal premium. In other words, the contract would rise from €47,000 to €147,000 for the commune of 3,800 inhabitants.

"We can't afford not to have insurance," insists Marc Médina, who has called in a specialist consultant to find an insurer willing to take on his commune. Because "it will be impossible for the commune, in the event of a glitch, to take on the financial risk." "If, for example, a man were to injure himself while jogging on a road and need care for years, the taxpayers would have to pay ad vitam aeternam," adds his neighbor from Sainte-Marie. "But it's the insurer's job to take risks," points out the mayor of Torreilles.

The two councillors then turned their attention to the State: "We should set up a fund to protect local authorities," suggested Marc Médina. In essence, this is what Edmond Jorda intends to demand, arguing: "The State must at least provide an offer.

"Reinsurers see risks multiplying and passing them on to insurance companies".

SMACL, an insurance company specializing in local authorities, refers to a domino effect almost "beyond its control". Its press office, contacted on Monday, confirms that local authorities all over France are increasingly receiving "notices of payment due in the course of the year". The explanation for this phenomenon? "We take into account the sinister nature of the situation at national level. And it so happens that, whereas 5 or 10 years ago, the risks of natural phenomena occurring were one-off or rare, today they are becoming 'systemic'. The recurrence of such events is increasingly costly to indemnify, and the very large sums involved mean that insurers are obliged to reinsure with very large multinationals, often abroad." The bill includes the weather, of course, but also riots, which are on the increase, and their attendant material damage.

All this is mutualized and passed on. In the end, explains SMACL, "insurers have no choice but to tighten up their conditions, either by reviewing ceilings or increasing deductibles."

Here too, the company has initiated discussions with the government. The aim: "to make the regulations evolve." To put it plainly: "Perhaps the State could play a greater role in this type of situation, so that elected representatives are not left without a solution. Because," SMACL points out lucidly, "claims are not going to stop tomorrow.

"Insurers are becoming more and more cautious, so we have to negotiate by mutual agreement".

A former insurance agent in Perpignan, Dominique Boisserie is a consultant in public procurement and insurance for local authorities. Some forty communes in the Pyrénées-Orientales region have called on his services over the past two years, including Torreilles, for whom he is currently seeking a new insurance policy. His asset, says the professional, is the Groupement d'Intérêt Economique to which he belongs, which gives him a certain credibility in his dealings. "Over the past few years, a number of natural disasters have had a major impact on certain towns on the Catalan coast or near the Agly or Têt rivers. But they are also paying for the riots in other French towns. All our customers are feeling the pinch. And insurers are becoming increasingly cautious."

He explains that SMACL has had financial difficulties and recently merged with MAIF, which withdrew from the market, driving down the offer. Another insurance group with a strong presence in the local authority market, according to the specialist, has become "extremely selective about the risks it underwrites, and in particular has decided to take on far fewer local authorities." His solution today is to negotiate by mutual agreement. Discussions are tough, but at the price of higher deductibles in particular, they have a chance of succeeding.

Translated with www.DeepL.com/Translator (free version)

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Do you mean that some scientists will comply with Texas Republicans agenda and provide scientific endorsement to their climate change revisionism just to keep their funding and job ?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

or focus on anything other than getting the rich what they want at everyone else’s expense.

I guess that means they are able to do a good work, it's just that their good work is not about solving global problems.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well a reference is given to back up this affirmation : Extreme weather and climate events likely to drive increase in gender-based violence

As the climate crisis leads to more intense and more frequent extreme weather and climate-related events, this in turn risks increasing the amount of gender-based violence experienced by women, girls, and sexual and gender minorities, say researchers.

In a study published in The Lancet Planetary Health, a team led by a researcher at the University of Cambridge analysed current scientific literature and found that the evidence paints a bleak picture for the future as extreme events drive economic instability, food insecurity, and mental stress, and disrupt infrastructure and exacerbate gender inequality.

Between 2000 and 2019, floods, droughts, and storms alone affected nearly 4 billion people worldwide, costing over 300,000 lives. The occurrences of these extreme events represent a drastic change, with the frequency of floods increasing by 134%, storms by 40%, and droughts by 29% over the past two decades. These figures are expected to rise further as climate change progresses.

Extreme weather and climate events have been seen to increase gender-based violence, due to socioeconomic instability, structural power inequalities, health-care inaccessibility, resource scarcity and breakdowns in safety and law enforcement, among other reasons. This violence can lead to long-term consequences including physical injury, unwanted pregnancy, exposure to HIV or other sexually transmitted infections, fertility problems, internalised stigma, mental health conditions, and ramifications for children.

To better understand the relationship between extreme events and gender-based violence, researchers carried out a systematic review of existing literature in this area. This approach allows them to bring together existing – and sometimes contradictory or under-powered – studies to provide more robust conclusions.

The team identified 41 studies that explored several types of extreme events, such as storms, floods, droughts, heatwaves, and wildfires, alongside gender-based violence, such as sexual violence and harassment, physical violence, ‘witch’ killing, early or forced marriage, and emotional violence. The studies covered countries on all six of the major continents and all but one focused on cisgender women and girls.

The researchers found evidence that gender-based violence appears to be exacerbated by extreme weather and climate events, driven by factors such as economic shock, social instability, enabling environments, and stress.

According to the studies, perpetrators of violence ranged from partners and family members, through to religious leaders, relief workers and government officials. The relationship between extreme events and gender-based violence can be expected to vary across settings due to differences in social gender norms, tradition, vulnerability, exposure, adaptive capacity, available reporting mechanisms, and legal responses. However, the experience of gender-based violence during and after extreme events seems to be a shared experience in most contexts studied, suggesting that amplification of this type of violence is not constrained geographically.

“Extreme events don’t themselves cause gender-based violence, but rather they exacerbate the drivers of violence or create environments that enable this type of behaviour,” said Kim van Daalen, a Gates Cambridge Scholar at the Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge.

“At the root of this behaviour are systematic social and patriarchal structures that enable and normalise such violence. Existing social roles and norms, combined with inequalities leading to marginalisation, discrimination, and dispossession make women, girls, and sexual and gender minorities disproportionately vulnerable to the adverse impacts of extreme events.”

Experiencing gender-based violence can also further increase vulnerability. When faced with the likelihood of experiencing harassment or sexual violence in relief camps, for example, some women or sexual and gender minorities choose to stay home or return to their homes even before doing so is safe, placing them in additional danger from extreme events and furthering restrict their already limited access to relief resources.

Extreme events could both increase new violence and increase reporting, unmasking existing violence. Living through extreme events led some victims to feel they could no longer endure abuse or to feel less inhibited to report the abuse than before the event. However, the researchers also noted that reporting remains  plagued by a number of factors including silencing of victims – particularly in countries where safeguarding a daughter’s and family’s honour and marriageability is important – as well as fears of coming forward, failures of law enforcement, unwillingness to believe victims, and the normalisation of violence.

Van Daalen added: “Disaster management needs to focus on preventing, mitigating, and adapting to drivers of gender-based violence. It’s crucial that it’s informed by the women, girls, and sexual and gender minority populations affected and takes into account local sexual and gender cultures and local norms, traditions, and social attitudes.”

Examples of such interventions include providing post-disaster shelters and relief services – including toilets and bath areas – designed to be exclusively accessed by women, girls, and sexual and gender minorities or providing emergency response teams specifically trained in prevention of gender-based violence.

Likewise, empowerment initiatives for women and sexual and gender minorities that challenge regressive gender norms to reduce vulnerability could bring opportunities to negotiate their circumstances and bring positive change. For example, women’s groups using participatory- learning-action cycles facilitated by local peers have been used to improve reproductive and maternal health by enabling women to identify and prioritise local challenges and solutions. Similar programmes could be adapted and applied in extreme event management to empower women as decision makers in local communities.

...

Case studies

Flooding and early marriage in Bangladesh

Studies suggest a link between flooding incidence and early marriage, with spikes in early marriages observed in Bangladesh coinciding with the 1998 and 2004 floods. Next to being viewed as a way to reduce family costs and safeguard marriageability and dignity, these marriages are often less expensive due to flood-induced impoverishment lowering expectations.

One study included an example of the head of a household explaining that the 2013 cyclone had destroyed most of his belongings, leaving him afraid that he would be unable to support his youngest unmarried daughter, who was under 18. Marrying off his daughters was a way of reducing the financial burden on the family.

ReferenceVan Daalen, KR. Extreme events and gender-based violence: a mixed-methods systematic review. Lancet Planetary Health; 14 June 2022; DOI: 10.1016/PIIS2542-5196(22)00088-2

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

This might have an interesting potential yet I am quite sceptical.

Desalination doesn't just get rid off the salt but also most of the water's minerals. Lack of minerals in the water used everyday can be harmful for human health and also for agriculture. This poor water can't provide enough minerals or worst even adsorb the ones from the human body same with the soil. This is why many desalination plants have remineralization process by adding some or reusing minerals extracted from the brine.

If such a system is deployed it would have to address this problem as well as providing solutions to dispose or utilize the brine.

Remineralization of desalinated water: Methods and environmental impact

Israeli Scientists Fear Public Health Risks from Desalinated Seawater

view more: next ›