mangomission

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

Sure it’s old but the stats I posted in a lower comment show that at YouTube’s scale, it makes sense to store.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Sorry didn’t mean to be rude was just being silly

[–] [email protected] 19 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Post here anyway rule

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

Yeah I replied below with actual numbers

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I think you might be underestimating how many users YouTube has! According to this, 720,000 hours per day are uploaded versus 1,000,000,000 hours are watched per day!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago (5 children)

Do you have a source? My instinct is the opposite. Compute scales with users but storage scales with videos

[–] [email protected] 22 points 2 years ago

Same I’m definitely a fellow normal person

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (9 children)

Are you suggesting they don’t store different versions? This suggests they do.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 years ago (11 children)

I believe they store and that’s why it processes lowest res first and works up

[–] [email protected] 44 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I feel like the early adopters of lemmy are chronically online and shitposting keeps them sane

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Are you wondering if one instance can be spread across multiple machines? I don’t think that’s possible and seems unnecessary. I say that because spreading users onto more instances creates less load on the larger instances, not more. Edit: I guess you can scale instances across machines!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Nice that they can control it more, but I’d bet most companies don’t want to maintain their own instance

view more: next ›