mexicancartel

The one tagged "female" was just a bottom view and they both look similiar? Is that the joke?

They specifically said "this is not a typo"!!!

Textures and songs are not a thing on most apps right? For android, using Kotlin has created much bigger appsize than old java

Increasing speed -> acceleration Decreasing speed -> negative acceleration Changing direction -> Vector acceleration(change in velocity)

It's called dual-booting, and yes there are so many tutorials availiable. But you have to be a little more careful in that process. I do dualboot but almost never uses windows. I have heard situation where windows updates messing linux installs on same drive. The safest route might be to do what others suggested but it is possibe to install that way. Be careful with partitioning and formatting. You also have to determine the sizes for each partitions yourself too

I don't think i'm getting what you said or you are not getting what I said. It makes no sense to me(not about charge attract thing, but the overall argument). Does the nucleus accelerate when there is electrone cloud on all directions? It just cancels out. But i don't think nucleus will freely move if temperature is low. You don't apply pressure to the nucleus, you apply it to the electron cloud around. Nucleus won't fly off the electron cloud because they are bound by electrons attracting in all directions. Only way I can see neutrons moving is when enough temperature is supplied. Otherwise its just squishing electrons into the nucleus(before squishing nucleii together). I don't understand why you keep it does not matter because there is so much pressure or so. Clarify why you said so

Umm why are they accelerated to electrons?

What about the inverse beta decay thing? If electrons are also being compressed it should end up becoming neutrons right?

Electron repulsion might be irrelevant but being bound to electrons isn't. Electrons aren't being thrown out of the orbit here since its cold. It's getting squished into.

(I also disagree with the net zero claim, due to the sheilding effect of outer electrons, but still that too is irrelevant so np)

There is magnetic force. A moving charge across a magnetic feild experiences it and it is always perpendicular to motion of the charge. So it changes the direction of motion. Since magnets are basically objects with electrons spinning in an oriented fashion, making a current loop(like an electromagnet), it is also appling to the macroscopic case. But the work done is probably done by electric feild in some manner as the title implies. I don't know how exactly it plays out though.

But magnetic force does no work to a charged particle in any way. While gravitational force CAN do work and it does work on most cases(every non circular orbits or just a mass falling down). That's why magnetic force case is emphasised.

But on your take about magnets, its not the magnetic force that do the work but the associated electric force

Gravity does no work on satellites or objects that go in circular orbits. The force is there but it does no work and hence no energy change/transfer. Work is defined based on energy change by work-energy theorem

It's usually said about a charge under a magnetic feild. The magnetic force goes perpendicular to the direction of motion of the charge(F=qv×B*). Work is done only if the force is applied along the direction of motion. So on a moving charge, magnetic force does no work.

Not sure how that plays on magnets though. Magnets are magnetic because electrons go in circles producing the feild, and it might be because electric feild comes in and do the work but it's not clear for me either