paequ2

joined 3 months ago
[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

I still feel like it’s shady to keep calling it “open source” when open source is already well defined.

They are not open source. They do not currently claim to be open source.

https://futo.org/about/futo-statement-on-opensource/

calling our software “open source.” ... we’re changing. ... We’ll use the term “source first” instead for our projects.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Oh, interesting. Bruce Perens (co-founder of the Open Source Initiative) was involved BUSL (BSL) and Post-Open.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

If you statically link against an LGPLed library, you must also provide your application in an object (not necessarily source) format, so that a user has the opportunity to modify the library and relink the application.

Yeah, I think this is the hard part with Go. I've never seen anyone do anything with objects in Go. Everything is compiled into 1 binary, often statically linked. I'm not sure it's possible to build a Go binary by using object files.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago

TIL about Post-Open license. I've also been looking at BSL and FUTO's Source First license.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 days ago (3 children)

LGPL

The license seems to be targeted towards languages like C/C++. On the other hand, languages like Go do a lot of static linking, so it may be impossible to comply with this license in Go.

MPL may be a good alternative here.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

you don’t care that much about the AGPL clauses (e.g. because your app isn’t a server).

I've been thinking about this recently... Let's say you develop some local CLI. You think it's not a server, so you license as GPL.

Later someone comes and offers your CLI as SaSS. They write the server piece that just calls your local CLI on their server and pipes the input and output between the user.

So... should you always prefer AGPL over GPL?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Every car I've owned has had a way to change the speedometer from freedom units to ✨ metric ✨ .

For knowing what speed I should be going, I roughly follow these numbers. (Note, these are not equivalent.)

  • 35mph -> 50km/h
  • 60mph -> 100km/h
  • 70mph ->110km/h

Also, very roughly 10km ≈ 5mi.

However, most of the time I just follow the flow of traffic.

I voluntarily switched to metric like 10 years ago, so meters, celsius, grams, etc make more sense to me now.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

TIL https://crossidiomas.com/que-te-folle-un-pez/

This idiom may seem vulgar and offensive at first glance, but it has a deeper meaning that reflects the culture and mentality of the Spanish people.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

... Do what the kid says.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago (3 children)

What's this in Spanish?

[–] [email protected] 34 points 1 week ago (1 children)

UND KEINE EIER!

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago

I'm gonna download more RAM right meow! https://downloadmoreram.com/

 
 

We are going to go out on a limb here and say that if people are regularly finding techniques to disable AI summaries in Google searches, perhaps that means they do not want them in the first place?

 

Is the DM button called "Privately mention"? Or is that something else?

 

Currently, my email is hosted at Migadu. The email hosting is fine. However, they don't seem to offer strong *DAV support. They don't really advertise it and the little documentation they have says "we offer basic calendar support. Please be aware this is a beta feature and some functionalities are missing".

Is there such a thing as a DAV provider, like email provider, but only for WebDAV, CardDAV, and CalDAV?

Or is the answer just to self host Radicale or sabre?

It seems like if I want better DAV support, I'd have to switch email providers... which is kinda annoying.

I still keep my contacts and calendars on Google because it seems the most stable. I don't care about having the maximum possible privacy, I just care about not losing the data.

Someone told me about etesync, but I didn't like it because it's not DAV and you have to use their client apps.

I'm really surprised that most companies have standardized on DAV for contacts and calendars. That seems great because (theoretically) I can use any client.

 
view more: ‹ prev next ›