r00ty

Well, I'd expect that if they allowed 5v through but with a low current limit (I think the default 5v standard states quite a low current allowance). They could catch anything drawing too much and shut the port off until it detects disconnection/other reset.

I mean, if they're thinking about protecting a downstream device, adding this logic would make more sense than just not supplying any power unless a negotiation is made.

In any case, since standard USB ports on a computer will output 5v without anything being negotiated, then it's really no less safe than any other USB port in that regard.

But wait. Doesn't this make them both dumb? I'd expect a modern USB-C charger to still support basic 5v low current lazy devices too. If there's a USB-A to C cable that works, it must also still be possible to send the basic 5v down a C-C cable.

I also think there's always going to be a balance between how much a device needs to make and/or how much it needs fast charging to make sense to add the charging circuit for PD/PPS. Even $1-2 on top of the cost can ruin margins in the current electronic market.

I've been to the US twice since 9/11 and neither time was I asked for my phone. Not to say it didn't happen before now. It happens in many countries if they decide they have even a tiny bit of suspicion.

But, frankly right now I would not travel to the USA for any reason.

Pretty sure I can see a tattoo on that dinosaur!

I used my own content controls to block reddit for a year. Well, a bit longer so far.

Yeah, but it randomly freezes for me in Linux. Really annoying.

Otherwise it looks quite nice.

The point he makes in this episode about the menu prices. This is probably the same reason your supermarkets don't include sales tax on the pricing. If they did most people would go to the "cheaper" one.

Most of the world have laws to require this, and things are much clearer.

No one will change this behaviour voluntarily, as they showed people will see the ones that don't change as cheaper, even when in reality they're not.

If everyone has to change to meet legal requirements, then they will all need to change and it'll be fine.

Yeah I don't see it as a problem when the users control access to their own posts.

It's when they require a sign in to see anything, it's a problem.

Those billionaires need to look out for eachother.

The government absolutely uses sql frequently, even if they still have older mainframes with some other database architecture.

This makes more sense. But even then they would surely transfer data from the old system over.

I mean I'm liking the idea that they went down into the basement, started up an old mini computer, with "superman 3" magnetic tapes with data from the 1980s to force them to try to integrate with that and only after transferring the data at 1000cps, find out it's entirely out of date.

I mean, it won't be the case, but I'd really like it to be. 😛

It's a terminology thing really yes. I mean a database (SQL or not) shouldn't need de-duplication by nature of how the record index/keys work.

If they're not using a form of SQL though, I'd be very interested in what they are using. Back in the 90s I was messing around with things like Btrieve and other even more antiquated database engines. But all the software I used that utilised such things was converted to use a form of SQL (even if in some cases there were internal wrappers to allow access in the older way too via legacy code) over 20 years ago.

If I were an American though my biggest concern would be that Musk is able to know the structure AND content of the social security database. His post (if we believe it) demonstrates he must have access to both pieces of information.

I monitor for good deals. Because there's no contract it's easy to add one, move stuff over at your leisure and kill the old one off. It's the better way to do it for semi serious stuff.