raef

I don't know. I go to news portals or aggregates or feeds for news. Do people actually just type "news" into Google? I suppose for specific events, but I could actually see it being true that news searches weren't making up much of the activity. The way it's going to be is subscription based or publicly funded for anything worthwhile

I think it's problematic to require an organization to do something and then charge for it. It's one thing if they do something of their own volition and then are required to pay

I think they're setting up to negotiate not paying. I don't think people should depend on Google to provide a social good at their cost

This was more a stunt because France is demanding Google pay to link to news sites. It's the opposite of whether search engines should be required to list them

Just my two cents: I've had occasional problems with games through steam on dual monitors. Things like losing mouse focus or changing resolution on the other monitor (though that hasn't happened for a long time).

Monitors are old Asus. I won't bother looking up the models as I'm sure they're outdated

It has just gotten back from the vet after surgery

If only Fast and Furious movies were forgotten

That could be, even just considering one language to parse from. I heard efficiency and just thought speed

I would hope so, but as a demonstration, it wasn't very impressive. They should have left subtitles up transcripting everything

How much faster was it? I was reading along with the gibber and not losing any time

"For", "against"

It was the British under George Cockburn who captured Washington.