If you make a picture today of someone based on how they looked 10 years ago, we say it's depicting that person as the age they were 10 years ago. How is what age they are today relevant?
rchive
joined 2 years ago
If you make a picture today of someone based on how they looked 10 years ago, we say it's depicting that person as the age they were 10 years ago. How is what age they are today relevant?
Literally nothing I said justifies that assumption.
Nothing I said suggested beating or anything physical at all.
People listing people like Trump or Mitch McConnell might want to check their privilege. Actual mass murderers like Putin still walk free.
They should make batteries that swap out completely so you can load a fully charged one in in a few seconds and let your old one charge while you're off driving somewhere else. Or you just exchange the battery permanently like with some propane tanks.
I'd prefer that the people who did the beating not be allowed to be in office anymore. There's a lot of people on that list.
When Trump dumped a bunch of money on the economy in 2020, he did contribute to a bunch of inflation, yes.
This is why individual insurance is better. You can switch to a better provider without convincing a large bureaucracy first.
It varies by region or state. Some places you can discipline pretty easily, others your ex will use your any discipline at all as a reason to take your kids away.
People just want fewer kids now, or they want them later. It's not the money, it's that kids are a drag.
view more: next ›
I'm obviously not advocating or defending any particular behavior.
Legally speaking, why is what age they are today relevant rather than the age they are depicted as in the picture? Like, imagine we have a picture 20 years from now of someone at age 37. It's legally fine until it's revealed it was generated in 2023 when the person in question was 17? If the exact same picture was generated a year later it's fine again?