rglullis

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] rglullis@communick.news 3 points 16 hours ago

I don't know what you mean by "server setup of yours", but I'm glad to help. :)

[–] rglullis@communick.news 4 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

The main reason is that I strongly believe that we need to move away from server-centric software for social media and to start working on a local-first application that can browse the social web "natively". I wrote a series of blog posts explaining the shortcomings of current AP server software, and how the current architecture will not be enough to achieve mainstream.

I've already developed a generic ActivityPub Server and I recently started exploring the client side as well.

[–] rglullis@communick.news 8 points 17 hours ago (4 children)

Is there any chance you'd consider implementing this as a "generic" ActivityPub client? Instead of using Lemmy's API, you could query the AP endpoints directly.

[–] rglullis@communick.news 3 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (1 children)

I think the model is perfectly valid, so much so that I am also providing a similar service to serve this same niche. I just wanted to point out this in case someone comes to me and say "you are charging $14/month for GoToSocial, this is so much more than $COMPETITOR". Yes, my base price is higher but I do not put any limits on the database and even my lowest capacity plans have a very generous soft-limit 100GB media storage.

[–] rglullis@communick.news 4 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

Well, sure, that's the usual tactic: hook users into your platform and then after they already invested the time to get things set up, make them pay.

I really hope these strategies don't become the norm. The amount of people who are willing to pay for hosting is still quite small, I don't want to have to take Communick into some race to the bottom to compete for these customers.

Also, they do charge for media storage. So, even if you are not paying for the instance you may find yourself paying a significant bill because you follow a bunch of media-heavy accounts.

[–] rglullis@communick.news 4 points 23 hours ago (5 children)

They don't have pricing listed for GoToSocial, but judging by their Mastodon packages their entry options are very limited in capability. 2GB for the database and 10GB for media storage will fill up very quickly if you follow more than a few dozen accounts.

[–] rglullis@communick.news 12 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

No, I don't think he is sleazy or have ill-intentions. I think he genuinely wants to do good things.

The problem it's just that he lacks focus and he worries more about feeling validated than dealing with the daily grind of continuously improving his product. As soon as any of his projects start getting a minimal amount of interest and people start depending on what he has promised, he finds himself some "new" project to be busy with. At the same time, he still feels possessive about his creations, so it's hard for him to just delegate away any significant part of the system.

I hope that the successful kickstarter makes him realize that shit got real and that he already got the validation that he was seeking, and that the money is enough to get him surrounded by good people who are a bit more focused on "proper" project management.

[–] rglullis@communick.news 13 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] rglullis@communick.news 10 points 3 days ago (3 children)

There was a reason given, but it smells of bovine excrement: https://mastodon.social/@dansup/114041543384358354.

When probed a bit more about it, the silence was deafening.

[–] rglullis@communick.news 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

It is is connected well enough as it is, and I also don't think that lemmy-federate is a good idea. It forces duplication of content on all instances, even if no one is actually interested.

[–] rglullis@communick.news 2 points 5 days ago (3 children)
[–] rglullis@communick.news 2 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (5 children)

Well established only relatively to the others.

This is the crucial part you seem unwilling to accept. You don't want to go to LW because of centralization, but you still have to resort to number 2 just to be able to maybe get enough support from the others

Meanwhile, this dinky little instance keeps slowly but steadily growing and outliving everyone else.

 

When I first joined Lemmy and created this instance, there was no emacs community with consistent activity. I created the community mostly to see if I could help in the efforts during the Reddit migration and because it's one of the subreddits that I was still visiting regularly.

I was also interested in having some communities where I could have full control to run some experiments: most notably the ability to have all submissions and contents mirrored from Reddit via alien.top.

These experiments and the effort to keep it fresh with content did make this most active emacs community (even without the mirroring bots) but to be honest today it feels out of place. Two years later, the landscape of instances are more of less consolidated and I'm no longer interested in running a community that does not belong to a topic-specific instance.

I strongly believe that there should be a cleaner separation between instances for groups and instances for people, and it would be kind of hypocritical to keep nurturing this community here when there is an instance focused on programming and software tools.

So, effective today, I am removing this community from fediverser.network as the recommended alternative and I'm going to list !emacs@programming.dev as the best place for emacs content. I don't know if there is a standard procedure established for these types, so I'm going to keep the community open for the next 90 days and keep this post pinned until then. On June 1st, I will close down this community altogether.

 

cross-posted from: https://communick.news/post/2494298

If you are not aware, sportbots is a project that mirrors Twitter accounts from popular sport reporters, players and the leagues themselves. These bots are presented as regular ActivityPub actors, which means that they can be followed from Mastodon and any other AP service that is oriented towards microblogging.

With my work on Fediverser and the ActivityPub Toolkit, I'm realizing that we could do something similar for Lemmy. The Fediverser system could keep a database of these bots accounts and then map them to the relevant Lemmy instances/communities.

I'd like to get some opinions on how best to do this. Here are some of my ideas, in order of preference:

  1. Reach out to the developer behind sportbots.xyz and ask them to add this integration directly, to make sure that the bots post not just to Mastodon-like systems, but to groups as well.

Pros: it can be very straightforward. No new bots being created on the Fediverse. Cons: the code seems to be closed, so we have to rely on the dev to implement this.

  1. Add the functionality to Fediverser to map mastodon/twitter/bluesky accounts to Lemmy mirror bots, and also map these accounts to the specific communities where they should be posting.

Pros: Accounts could be eventually be used by the real owner. Open source. Cons: More bots in the Fediverse (not at alien.top scale, though). Not that many Lemmy admins seem interested in deploying Fediverser so far.

  1. Create a separate project from Fediverser that does what sportbots is doing, but focused on Lemmy.

Pros: most flexible. Could be easier for other people to run it if interested. I would be sure to open source it. Cons: It's yet-another project that I would be taking on, and I don't have any more bandwidth for new projects unless they are guaranteed to bring some revenue.

Please, let's avoid any "who cares about sports?" or "I only want organic content here" type of discussion. We need content here if we want to get more people to stay active and if you don't care about sports or the bots, just feel free to block them.

31
Notes on Nix (newsletter.goodtechthings.com)
 

A community to help people on Lemmy discover and promote the photographers that are looking to showcase their work on the Fediverse.

Rules are simple:

  • Links should be to a post with a photo.
  • Photo should not be your own content.

!fediclicks@viewfinder.pro

view more: next ›