saltesc

In referring to AI Mania and the disdain people got discovering genAI is still disappointingly a long way off. It wasn't a leaps and bounds thing, just LLMs bringing the attention back on like there was a breakthrough, though the pace of the tech has not changed.

Expect a resurgence in a few more years once the world is done with betas and thing improve at the same old rate. I think the best we got coming up is genAI assisting the increase of speed toward actual AI as a whole. Reliable generative iterations would be really helpful, but we're obviously not there yet and likely not for a little while more.

In the meantime, the global open betas not advertised as such have done their job, but have left a foul taste in mouths.

I don't think that's what Bush was thinking in 1990 when he split H1, nor what Truman was thinking when he made it.

In fact, with the current state of unemployment and skilled workers, the US needs as many educated/skilled people migrating as fast as possible, but I think it's too late.

I feel like that one's expected and therefore not the biggest threat. Everyone knows what the biggest threat is but only that it's spineless and makes no sense, so good luck planning ahead for it. Numbers should help, but have seem meaningless in the past.

It feels like AI Mania has come to an end. Kind of like Facebook, the only ones still on it are your parents.

Too late. Globalisation has just sized up the US.

A new leader and government will help, but what a monumental pit to come out of. The first term will be mostly spent plugging holes and repairing.

Barely six months in and American citizens are on their knees—literally if ICE are there with an unmarked van—and no one's doing a thing. It's like every part of the American Constitution was just for show all this time.

How's making America great again going?

Look; they're either pro-pedo or they've got nothing to worry about. What's it gonna be?

But at the moment they seem to be very against ",nothing to worry about,".

Doing potion well
Ready to do the magic
A-A-A-Bugger

Oh. My. God.

Thank you SO much for sharing that!

The article is talking about on-costs to the national economy, not what is achievable in physics or not. Same concept of the fuel expenditure in space programs exiting the atmosphere.

Desoite it's reputation, Australia's geography makes its flora, ecosystems, and fauna very fragile.

Overcoming a mountain range four times the size of Great Britain for a population density that's 1.3% of just one Great Britain doesn't make financial or, in Australia's case, environmental sense. They're still trying to fix up the mistakes they made to the environment during colonialism, plus the modern globalisation ones.

Energy for recommending train solutions is more efficiently directed to countless other places. Else we may as well be mentioning Liberians could just get a Costcobto solve their issues.

Just like most things in mechanics. It's almost always some bullshit you weren't prepared for or didn't even know was a thing and the hours tick away. But every time after that only takes a few minutes after some quick disassembly then reassembly.

My first oil and filter change took over an hour. But it's normally a 0.5/5 difficulty, 10 min job including the time waiting for oil to finish draining.

They're definitely used, but there's a massive mountain range in the way down the entire East and South coast. And it ain't subtle either. You're at sea level, then suddenly climbing very steep.

It's called The Great Dividing Range because that's what it does.

But if you're not needing a vehicle to get around, just going city to city on the same side of the ranges, train is good. High speed rail would be excellent. Australia is a perfect candidate for it since so many kilometres need to be eaten up getting between places and where it's flat, it's real flat