stebo02

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 day ago
[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago

she's cute tho

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 days ago

I assumed they might be working in certain fields of science where the most progress is very recent so old papers will be very incomplete and sometimes even wrong.

My field is particle physics and while a paper from 1994 wouldn't be completely useless, I would need to check if recent papers still confirm the same results.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago

I will miss her😓

[–] [email protected] 97 points 2 days ago (20 children)

what's wrong with this? 1994 is indeed the late 1900s, and it's 31 years ago so depending on the topic they're writing on, it could be immensely outdated

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

that's only because they aren't a sufficiently large enough group of people

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

yeah fuck those guys

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 days ago (2 children)

is that a discord alternative?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 days ago

it depends how pedantic you are about the exact definition but I think (or hope) most people agree that would be genocide

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

what is this? an historically accurate meme??

[–] [email protected] 40 points 2 days ago (19 children)

Or maybe killing a group that doesn't qualify the definition of genocide?

yeah let's kill a group of people that is not a group of people

view more: ‹ prev next ›