You're welcome to hold that opinion but you can't claim it's supported by history; we've had political parties die and be replaced plenty of times before.
sunshine
joined 2 years ago
The person you're replying to is describing (without giving proper context except for "game theory") an algorithm that's fairly successful at the "iterated prisoners dilemma": https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tit_for_tat
That's interesting. What kind of massage are you talking about here?
To be quite honest I never allowed my Kindle or my Kobo to go online and the experience is not that different. The build quality on the Kindle is a bit better superior and I might well go back. Calibre is the real hero of the story IMO.
I just got a Kobo color (don't recommend the color feature; no book is ever going to use it except the red-letter Bible and House of Leaves) and gifted the old Kindle to a friend. I e-reader is an awesome gift actually because for a lot of people it's something they would never evenly in years take a chance on, but that they would love it if they tried.
I really wish journalists would write, for example, "they say that they want to return it to the mission" rather than "they want to". They do this with Trump all the time. ("he believes tariffs are a powerful tool" - the fuck he does)
"Blades in the Dark but make it Archer"? Yes please my god
Yes; it would be great to have fixed this
The word that you're avoiding here - and please don't take this as a criticism; I have zero opinions about you or whether this word applies to you based on your post - but there is a word that very exactly denotes what you're describing, which is "hypocrisy".
Take it easy, Rorschach
Is this for individuals or households?