triclops6

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Ooh so it's both

Kevon is right, one tax benefit is the cost of the show: whether they cancel it or not they get to write off those expenses, and they get a tax break there

Chris would be correct too though: if Netflix holds the IP as assets on the balance sheet, they'd be held at some present value of expected royalties. When they cancel the show id imagine that asset value takes a shit, that's a write off, so tax benefit there

That said no business does this to make money from the tax asset, you have to lose more than the government gives you back

More likely Netflix is high off it's own farts and thinks just money can make cinema magic and it clearly can't.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

And KFC Daddy is Santa there... They like to mix it up

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Only for the having of slaves

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Yeah those are a great introduction for anyone interested

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

No it has to be pretty thorough, the othersll just use their funds to better insulate, and change laws

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Fountain pens!

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

This is quite the rabbit hole!

Any resources for someone starting off?

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 year ago

Assuming 4 digit password it's 4 factorial, 24 combinations

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Brr (for cold) And brrrrrrrrr (for money printer)

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I appreciate that, genuinely.

But this troll straw-manned the gun control argument to "banning all guns" -- their position is stupid.

And the thing is, at this point whether that stupidity is either willful, or obtuse, they're not changing it.

[–] [email protected] 46 points 1 year ago (8 children)

Gun nut's gonna gun nut, logic need not apply

view more: ‹ prev next ›