My next web stack: chota.css, verga.js, poronga.html & pija.php :D
valpackett
joined 2 years ago
Banning channels is not the same as sharing private data
Why can't I find any articles about decompiling and researching this one? :(
Yes, blahaj is running 0.18.x now as you can see in the footer on the web version
Keeping out a vendor-specific one in favor of a vendor-agnostic one seems actually positive to me. That vendor-specific "superiority" must be fought.
I loved True Colors as well.
What would even be the point of an official remaster when you can combine the OpenMW engine with a mod pack? And there's Skywind the great remake still in the making…
Sure, I mean, I don't have any of these though, and I don't want to deal with even the remote possibility of snail mail arriving From The Internet.
Njalla is bad because you don’t actually own the domain and there have been instances of them shutting down / revoking access?
Haven't heard of them revoking access for any legitimate users. I like not actually owning the domain because this means not ever seeing a fucking form asking for my literal home address.
- WHOIS privacy is like the most common feature among registrars?
- Mail forwarding isn't always free but pretty common too
- According to dongleauth DNSimple, Gandi, Namecheap, and Porkbun also support webauthn right now (hover plsss)
Hair removal is hair removal, there's no need for "trans services". You're not obligated to out yourself to the professionals.
One bit of laser advice: do ask the person doing it to use more power!
??? Channels are literally public by definition and viewable even without an account. That's the whole point of channels. They're more like blogs than messages.