On consoles I believe? Can't remember if PC had thisor even gamepad support.
whataboutshutup
joined 2 years ago
Из огня - да в полымя. Basically, from fire to fire, just with synonims.
Reads like eez ogh-nya dah f-poh-ly-mya.
Out of the frying pan into the fire as google translates it.
Doom on lenses when?
It could make a sci-fi thriller.
be me
a star traveler
opening a door
there's black hole
opening another
black hole
opening a fridge
yes, you guess it
black hole
With the way they reused, dynamically loaded assets before and tried to keep world seamless, they'd probably load\unload parts of these 125 Gb a lot, with this 16 Gb RAM requirement no less. They test it with SSD and make it so it doesn't have microstutter and loading problems on their target machine. Or, god forbid, loading screens when walking outside, like it was in TES3; or TES4 banning levitation and loading complex cities as different locations that won't work in a space sim etc etc. BethSoft had many problems with it already. I doubt it'd refuse to work, but if they build their game around it, the result is unpredictable. Bet, it'd load low-res LOD textures and only then replace them with okay ones. That'd probably ruin the spaceship landing – one of the, possibly, most demanding and visually sweet parts of the game. It looking great is their baseline here.
I feel it should be public and connected to an account, but this account shouldn't be connected to a person unless they explicitly wish so.
Lost your judgement for a sec.
With what level of trust pirated releases need, it's kinda worrysome to depend on that person. And they doesn't seem like one to share their secrets.
EMPRESS is their name and yeah, they are bonkers. They are also very picky and influenced by donations, so obscure games won't be cured from DENUVO ever. Judgement, a somehow popular Sega release, was cracked days ago, and it's a 2018 game. They picked a fight with a ripper\cracker Skidrow in .nfo announcing that.
Is there a way for admin teams and self-hosters to have a shared banlist, IP\instances included? Like a sideloading addition to a local filter, with a limited amount of collectively approved contributors commiting to it directly? I don't know how it should work, but it may possibly reduce their attacks' effectiveness.