So what, you think they shouldn't be reviewed bad for a broken game?
No, it's broken and shouldn't be for sale if they're not going to fix it.
Guess what, as a mobile dev, my job is to fix the broken shit on multiple OSs as well. It's the territory.
wholookshere
joined 10 months ago
It's almost like you can delist it in such a way you prevent people from paying money for a broken game with no intention of updating it again, and still leave it for people who currently have copies.
Wow that was such a garbage take.
Sure
But when people are replying to
https://lemm.ee/comment/17210238
Saying that anyone not calling out Microsoft is biased, is a bad take. And I'm not sure what your point of more context is needed?
A broken game gets negative reviews. I'm not sure what's biased about this.
Yes! That's a very common use case for VPNs in the corporate world.
So tailscale client, the apps you actually download are open source. What's not open source is the server side code.
Because the interface of tailscale is publicly known and available, someone went and made an open source server side version compatible with tailscale clients.
What's tail scale?
It's an easy to use VPN. I can expose just my server to the vpn and my community can easily gain access.
That yes, it doesn't bother me that Ubisoft is a consumer of Microsoft.
If Ubisoft doesn't update their product, they should be reviews negatively. If they don't like it they should de list it so people don't pay money for a broken product.
So, people should leave positive reviews for games that no longer work?
Like I get what your saying. It's not Ubisoft's fault.
But if they're not going to fix their old game, than it should be reviewed negatively so people don't spend money on a game that no longer works.
If they don't want that, than delist it.
Companies aren't people. So yes, my limit is "skin deep".
(Not the person you replied to).
100% not a cost optimized way to host, but much more about balancing cost vs manual maintenance.
Thanks!
Strong disagree.
Putting it in quotes highlights the alleged progress that gets talked about. But it calls it out as false. This isn't uncommon in English, not sure of other languages.
Started my transition 2021 (holy fuck that was a long time ago?!)
There is no right answer, nor does your answer have to stay the same.
There's a lot of processing that comes with this. I wouldn't recommend burning photos, but maybe putting them in a box where you no longer remember they exist.
I started wanting to burn it all, but I find myself wanting to show that pretransition me live, rather that disgust now days. It's still me, it's still made me who I am, but just like I'm no longer 14 year old me either, I'm no longer that person.
Ubisoft isn't the victim here, consumers buying broken games are.