they could move somewhere else where they wont be overpaying and let someone with less income move in. why inescapable?
zeca
joined 5 months ago
if it did, the text wouldnt be "the large majority" but "everyone".
this should have pictures of the shit, not of the bat...
being opt-out is still bad, but at least it would be a bit more honest.
VIvaldi is cool, but its not open source. If you worry about the trustworthiness of you browser, picking an open source one would be best IMO. Among the chromium-based, there are chromium itself, brave, ...
a lot of people use android tablets with bluetooth keyboards as if they were laptops
it is a rejection of a little part of Darwin's theory, yes, I know. I do agree with the main part though.
unnecessary traits might not always lead to extra cost, and even then, the extra cost might not always lead to extinction.
the extinction usually happens when a trait that represents a disadvantage in a sufficiently heavy competition for survival. If the competition is low enough, the trait may survive.
im sure some other companies that are allowed to use android will soon make devices like this to reach the global market. the device looks too attractive and convenient to remain a small niche.
we barely know a thing about them. maybe they were burning trash on the sidewalk
i like playing traffic rider while listening to something on yt. you ride a motorcycle between a bunch of cars and try not to crash.
view more: next ›
that would explain why they dont seem to care about climate change while they do seem to plan for the long term for some things. maybe they believe less people on the planet is a solution to climate change.