this post was submitted on 26 Jan 2025
652 points (100.0% liked)

World News

44442 readers
2502 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Donald Trump has suggested large numbers of Palestinians should leave Gaza to “just clean out” the whole strip, after ordering the US military to restart shipments of 2,000lb bombs to Israel.

The US president said he wanted Gaza residents to move to neighbouring nations, and that they could be displaced “temporarily or could be long-term”, after a phone call with Jordan’s King Abdullah on Saturday.

“I said to him: I’d love you to take on more because I’m looking at the whole Gaza Strip right now and it’s a mess, it’s a real mess. I’d like him to take people,” Trump said, when asked about the call.

He also suggested Egypt as a destination for Gaza residents, and said he would raise the issue with President Abdel Fatah al-Sisi on Sunday.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 263 points 1 month ago (13 children)

Reeeeeeeeeally hard to stop my self from screaming “I fucking told you so” to all the idiots who insisted Trump would be better for the situation right now

This is literally the exact thing I’ve been trying to point out for months

[–] [email protected] 61 points 1 month ago (1 children)

https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/israel-gaza-palestinians-concept-paper-1.7015576

The plan was always their. They would get away with it even if it was biden or harris would won

[–] [email protected] 68 points 1 month ago (2 children)

It was Israel’s plan yes, not official us policy like now.

[–] [email protected] 40 points 1 month ago (4 children)

What would you make think biden or harris would have blocked such a plan?

[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 month ago (8 children)

Because they already were. Only siths and maga deal in absolutes. Which are you?

[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 month ago (1 children)

They never was. Every time the US say to Israel to not do something Israel does it and then the US give them more bomb and aids and diplomatic protection.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 month ago

The copium is thinking that Biden,harris and trump wouldn't try to outcompete each other is supporting Isrsel

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Can we keep this cringe Funkopop liberalism on Reddit please.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 month ago (4 children)

It’s called objectivity sweetie and I’m an anarchist ✌️

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Maybe the fact that the Biden administration withheld 2000 lbs bombs from Israel and Biden repeatedly cussed Netanyahu out over the phone? Maybe because the genociders backed the Trump presidency fiercely?

Btw those held weapons shipments were happily continued by Trump earlier.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 month ago

Actually, yes. For the Palestinians anyway.

[–] [email protected] 48 points 1 month ago (11 children)

Nobody I know thought Trump would be better for Gaza. Just that Genocide is the worst situation and it was already being ignored.

[–] [email protected] 58 points 1 month ago (3 children)

But now we get more death! Immigrants, trans people, FEMA, it’s like a Gatcha game of who else gets to suffer. We really taught them a lesson

[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

The dem leadership knew the whole time exactly how to win the election but werent willing to pay the price in thwarting AIPAC to secure that win. All they had to do was recognize the genocide a few days before the election and follow existing laws on it, and acknowledge that many Americans are struggling. They chose to roll the dice instead.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I pointed this out to a dem apologist on bluesky and their response was that ending the genocide on its own wouldn't have won the election.

Motherfucker, what?! Quite apart from the fact that ending a genocide shouldn't be evaluated on how likely it is to win an election, it is the right thing to do and it would have helped.

But the dems decided that continuing the genocide was more important than improving their chances of beating Trump. Assuming they believe what we were told that Trump would be worse at the genocide, that means the dems decided to continue the genocide and also risk worse genocide. So they just chose genocide.

And now people are still trying to get up on their high horses about this shit.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 month ago

“I did not pull the lever in the trolly problem and it was the dems fault”

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 month ago (3 children)

If you're willing to let one group be subject to genocide, then all groups are eligible. You know how it goes, "first they came for[...]"

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 month ago

Why have to bother yourself with harm reduction when you can choose to do nothing and passively allow things to get worse? That would be asking too much.

[–] [email protected] 42 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Maybe geopolitics is more complicated than the anti-Kamala protest voters have been lead to believe...

[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 month ago (1 children)

If your "complicated" world view means justifying genocide then it's just a justification of murder.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Who did you vote for who wasn't justifying a genocide?

Edit: Worth noting, 17 downvotes at this time, yet not a single reply with a candidate who wasn't "justifying a genocide".

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Oh they both were, I'm just being real about what that means.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 month ago

It certainly is. Unfortunately for all of us, it's more complicated than the Dems and "lesser of two evil" voters (of which I was one) have been lead to believe as well.

Or they would have... you know... Won.

But hey, if we want to learn the wrong lesson from this again, far be it from me to stop us.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago (22 children)

A lot of people here on lemmy believe fiercely that both sides were equally bad about it, and it is exactly that sentiment that led to 6.6 Million former DNC voters staying home while a fascist took power.

load more comments (22 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] [email protected] 42 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Few people argued for Trump being better. Biden bombed Gaza to rubble. Trump comes in and does the paperwork. Biden is not absolved.

[–] [email protected] 52 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Biden didn't bomb Gaza genius.

[–] [email protected] 44 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I must have imagined those American bombs dropped by American made planes being sent by Biden.

He asked Netanyahu nicely to not carpet bomb Gaza with them. That absolves him of it all.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I must have missed the part where Biden was put in charge of Israel's military. You .ml folks are simpletons. 🙄

[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Come on, don't act like you don't know what he mean. He just mean thst Biden he is responsible by giving arms and diplomatic protection so Israel can bomb gaza

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I know what he means and he's wrong and so are you. Israel bombed Gaza. Full stop. Biden never had the power to stop it. Want to be angry at someone, choose the military industrial complex at the heart of America's economy. The president only works for them, no matter his name or party.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 month ago (9 children)

Yeah he have no power at all to the point of bypassing the congress to give melitary aid to israel.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago (7 children)

If Israel relies on US weapons, then yes the US has the power to stop it, by not supplying the weapons.

We know the weapons are going to be used for genocide. Supplying them is as good as pulling the trigger ourselves.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Is Trump in charge of Israel's military now because that's the only way for your comment to make any sense.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago (7 children)

No Netanyahu is n charge of Israel's military. That is my point.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Cranakis,

https://www.axios.com/2024/05/13/us-presidents-red-lines-israel

Eisenhauer, GHW Bush, and Reagan all stopped Israel's zionist violence dead cold with phone calls, in pretty much this exact same situation. Its well established history that you either aren't aware of or wont acknowledge-- neither possibility reflecting well on you.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 month ago (1 children)

When I was younger I played Skyrim, it seemed very unrealistic that NPCs though the wind shot them with an arrow, but seeing you I think they had quite good AI actually

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 month ago

In no way shape or form am I defending Biden here. His position was indefensible.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Trump is worse for saying the quiet part out loud, but the actions by all administrations since the establishment of israel show that this plan by israel is being followed regardless of what the president says out loud.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Hur dur genius nostradamus here.

Nobody who watched genocide joe support genocide for over a year had any hope for 2025 and beyond.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Why didn't you have an issue with it at any point in the past 15 months?

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I did. I still do. What’s your point?

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 month ago

You sure? It sure seems like your first thought here is "how can I rub this in the faces of those i feel like blaming for this" judging by your comment. You seem to want to retroactively remove Biden and Harris' culpability in bringing us to this point.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 month ago

They can still argue that situation is better now but it depends upon a very specific meaning of “better” that doesn’t consider the Palestinian people’s welfare at all.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 month ago (9 children)

He secured a ceasefire, which is more than Biden could do. But ultimately, is he better? I don't think so. I'm not sure he's any worse, either. I wish we had better options.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)