this post was submitted on 31 Jan 2025
38 points (100.0% liked)

Explain Like I'm Five

15771 readers
7 users here now

Simplifying Complexity, One Answer at a Time!

Rules

  1. Be respectful and inclusive.
  2. No harassment, hate speech, or trolling.
  3. Engage in constructive discussions.
  4. Share relevant content.
  5. Follow guidelines and moderators' instructions.
  6. Use appropriate language and tone.
  7. Report violations.
  8. Foster a continuous learning environment.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 45 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Flat taxes impact the poor dramatically more than the rich. I think that's the last thing we need right now.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (3 children)
[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 month ago (1 children)

If one earns $10,000 per year, a $2,000 annual tax is 20% of annualized income.

If one earns $100,000 per year, it’s 2%.

The less one earns, taxes are a greater proportion of total income.

Often, flat tax concepts come (or should come with) tax exemptions for actual low-income folks.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

A flat tax would be a set percentage of total income. It would cause the rich to pay more since they wouldn't have their deductions and loopholes, that's why there's so much bullshit propaganda against it.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

Even if it works exactly like that, let's say you are poor and barely make enough to live, you still have to give 20% (as an example) to the government, even if you are fucked after and can't pay rent or buy food. If you make 20% more than you need, you end up with nothing left after. Rich people may end up paying more, sure, but a flat tax still screws over the poor as a rule unless there is some provision that it only starts after X income, and you know that threshold will always be set too low.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago

The rich also have a hell of a lot more to tax. They SHOULD be paying a higher percentage of their wealth in taxes because they've gotten a much greater benefit out of the services those taxes pay for than a poor person.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago

If you make $50k annually and are taxed at a flat 25%, you're paying $12,500, leaving you with $37,500.

If you make $500k annually are are taxed at a flat 25%, you're paying $125,000, leaving you with $375,000.

It's a hell of a lot more difficult to support yourself and your family on $37,500 than it is on $375,000.