this post was submitted on 09 Feb 2025
1130 points (100.0% liked)
196
5305 readers
250 users here now
Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.
Rule: You must post before you leave.
Other rules
Behavior rules:
- No bigotry (transphobia, racism, etc…)
- No genocide denial
- No support for authoritarian behaviour (incl. Tankies)
- No namecalling
- Accounts from lemmygrad.ml, threads.net, or hexbear.net are held to higher standards
- Other things seen as cleary bad
Posting rules:
- No AI generated content (DALL-E etc…)
- No advertisements
- No gore / violence
- Mutual aid posts are not allowed
NSFW: NSFW content is permitted but it must be tagged and have content warnings. Anything that doesn't adhere to this will be removed. Content warnings should be added like: [penis], [explicit description of sex]. Non-sexualized breasts of any gender are not considered inappropriate and therefore do not need to be blurred/tagged.
Also, when sharing art (comics etc.) please credit the creators.
If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel or email.
Other 196's:
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Incoming "Integrity of Families Act" to prevent women from getting a divorce in 5... 4....
Realistically they don't want to ban divorce. They probably do want to ban no fault divorce though, and require you to demonstrate a "good" reason to divorce such as infidelity or abuse.
While making it somehow easier for the man to have a good reason than the woman.
They don't want to ban divorce because even in their worst case they want to be able to leave their wives. But doing something like requiring fault or making it so whoever files can't receive anything more than a split of assets gained during the marriage would suit all their purposes better than banning divorce outright.
They definitely want to ban divorce