DeclineIntoCensorship

448 readers

202 users here now

founded 4 months ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

365

They want us to be silent. (lemmy.dbzer0.com)

submitted 4 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

126 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago (2 children)

I'm not saying this couldn't happen, but this justdoesn't ring super true to me. How would the user know who the "identified individual" was, how they found the husband's information, or who they called (the "friend") at his company that's apparently in control of his employment? That's a lot of convenient coincidences that, even of they are true, would hardly be easily accessible information to make such a confident accusation.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago

truepeoplesearch.com

give it a go. Try searching your name, number, address and see what you get.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

If the employer is an University or something like that in a smaller state, and they called specifically about a policy change or something happening at the department of education, it could be relatively easy to happen, especially if they gave their name when calling the representative (which I guess you would).

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

That's a lot of assumptions.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago

Your face is an assumption