this post was submitted on 03 Feb 2025
1 points (100.0% liked)

Keep Track

825 readers
3 users here now

Keeping Track of the 2nd Trump administration!

One thing Donald Trump and the extreme right were very good at doing is burying the track record of his first presidency from 2017 to 2021.

Keep Track is dedicated to literally keeping track, day by day, of the policy decisions made by the new Trump Administration.

That is not to say we're interested in the crazy things he says or tweets, he clocked over 30,000 lies the last time he was in office, I don't see how it's possible to track all of that. This is about POLICY. Nominees, executive orders, signed laws, and so on.

Subject line format should be {{date}} {{event}} so: "01-20-2025 - Trump is sworn in."

The international date format of 2025-01-20 is also acceptable!

Links should be to verifiable news sources, not social media or blog sites. So no Xitter/Truth/Youtube/Substack/etc. etc.

Project 2025 tracker here!

https://www.project2025.observer/

founded 2 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Why are you here? You see people upset about Trump, and your first reaction is "these people are overreacting".

Then people explain to you why it's not an overreaction, and once you actually understand what's happening, you agree?

And yet you continue anyway?

I see you.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

You see people upset about Trump, and your first reaction is "these people are overreacting".

When did I say that?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Did I fucking say you said it?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Are you able to read minds? If I didn't say it, why are you assuming that was my reaction.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The word of the day is "implication."

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Then you are bead and understanding implications because I did not imply anything of the kind.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

You absolutely did, stop backpedaling. Own your ugly.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

This is the same kind of dumbass shit we saw defending him during the impeachment. "He didn't literally say the words quid pro quo so you can't claim that's what he was doing".

Smart people do not think this way. They don't need actions to have corresponding exposition to figure out what is going on

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Smart people do not think this way.

Then you are not as smart as you think you are, because you are imagining things that I did not do.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

Listen... Nobody here knows who you are. You don't need to save face... Maybe you can take this time to reflect.