It's not fascist to oppose intolerance. You are attacking people's core identities; their right to exist. It's not an attack on you when people defend themselves from you. We're not discussing our favorite movies here. Some other examples of harmful lies:

"People with dark skin are dumb"

"Women are too emotional to make their own decisions"

"Poor people don't deserve clean air, water and food"

"Being queer is a mental disorder"

"Many children grow out of gender identity disorder once they reach a certain age" (seriously, this is totally made up. Less than 5% of people do this and many of those only detransition because of the hate they encounter)

Climate change is hotly contested too. That doesn't mean the people contesting it have any valid points. People who are actually invested in evidence-based research, not those trying to cobble together post-hoc justification for their fear, have a general consensus that giving children a basic understanding of what is and isn't sexually appropriate makes them much safer. And if a child asks whether it's okay to like either gender, it's easy to simply answer "yes."

Go cheers yourself with your lies.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paradox_of_tolerance

The paradox of tolerance is a philosophical concept suggesting that if a society extends tolerance to those who are intolerant, it risks enabling the eventual dominance of intolerance, thereby undermining the very principle of tolerance. This paradox was articulated by philosopher Karl Popper in The Open Society and Its Enemies (1945),[1] where he argued that a truly tolerant society must retain the right to deny tolerance to those who promote intolerance. Popper posited that if intolerant ideologies are allowed unchecked expression, they could exploit open society values to erode or destroy tolerance itself through authoritarian or oppressive practices.

This paradox raises complex issues about the limits of freedom, especially concerning free speech and the protection of liberal democratic values. It has implications for contemporary debates on managing hate speech, political extremism, and social policies aimed at fostering inclusivity without compromising the integrity of democratic tolerance.

Above room temperature IQ shit, please use the brain I assume you're equipped with, but my faith in that is dwindling.

Opposing the views that trans people exist and that their rights matter does, indeed, make you a bigot.

No, I don't mind your difference in opinion, I'm more concerned with your vitriolic attitude, personally.

Show solidarity by not considering "think of the children" transphobia as simply a "different opinion." It's not far from considering homosexuals "sick in the head."