eugenevdebs

joined 5 months ago
[–] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 17 hours ago

AirVPN

I have been a happy customer with them. Not a fan of their GUI Client, but you're not required to use it. Very easy to share access with friends too whenever they need it.

This is the real personality tests, fuck Myers-Briggs and astrology. I need to know your choices for stationary.

Killing people in the middle east has been a source of income for us since the 1950s, a chat room error can only happen since the 90s, it's the new interesting thing for the media to gawk at as people are being killed.

Not just you, if they can ignore or defend Brave, they're on the side of its CEO. No questions about it.

Every time someone uses Brave, I know I can ignore their opinion. They're either a useful moron who is too dumb to look around them, or they support every single one of these things.

It's no wonder why 4chan's /g/ loves Brave.

[–] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (3 children)

So the CEO of the company funding Prop 8 to overturn gay marriage is nothing? Stealing from the creators it claimed to be funding? Being a right wing hotspot is cool with you?

Good to know that's where you stand.

[–] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

This place still insists that Trump's assassination attempt was a set up, a key point being "without looking it up, tell me who did it! That's proof!"

[–] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

And you never had any fun at a job before, got it.

But Harris told me the economy was doing great as my family had to balance eating food, paying rent, and getting my dad's medical bills for having a stroke. She'd never lie!

[–] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

It's Blue MAGA who will ignore anything critical of Dear Leader. Calling out their hypocrisy gets you downvoted and banned.

EDIT: Thanks for proving my point!

Cuba is looking better than America, especially with the reforms.

What is this formatting?

 
 

Inspired by a post as I read while working an odd job to help pay the bills in my home: https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/38653075?scrollToComments=true

I'm just reminded of how on Mastodon there was the #MastodonForHarris tag where people showed that they donated hundreds of dollars to Harris when she didn't need it.

When people asked "Why are you donating to her, she doesn't need your money, she is backed by the party. Why not donate to charity or your fellow mastodon people?" people said they couldn't be sure of the truth of people who were asking for $5.

And then the libs changed it to #Mastodon4Harris when people kept calling out how they have the money for donating to rich politicians but not for low income human beings.

 

Former Presidents Clinton, Obama, Biden and George W. Bush have barely uttered a word about President Trump’s actions a month into his second term, to the dismay of Democratic critics who say their voices are badly needed.

Those calling out for the ex-presidents to speak say Trump’s actions and the potential for him to bypass court orders should be red flags to the former occupants of the Oval Office.

“No one knows more about the importance of our presidents respecting separation of powers and showing restraint than former presidents,” Democratic strategist Joel Payne said. “Given Trump’s ongoing power grab, those voices and perspectives of our ex-presidents would be critical to the public discourse at this moment.”

“I don’t know what they’re waiting for,” one former senior aide to Obama said. “The time isn’t when Trump ignores court rulings. The time is now.”

Trump’s first month in office has been a whirlwind of activity in which he has sought to dramatically reduce the federal workforce while giving the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), led by Elon Musk, access to sensitive government payment systems. He has also sought to change birthright citizenship and dramatically curb federal spending.

Clinton, Biden and Obama repeatedly warned of the risks to the nation if Trump was reelected.

Biden — who said he decided to run for office in 2020 because democracy was on the line — warned days before he left office about the threat a second Trump administration posed.

In Biden’s farewell address, just days before Trump entered office again, Biden warned of an oligarchy “taking shape in America of extreme wealth, power, and influence that literally threatens our entire democracy, our basic rights and freedoms, and a fair shot for everyone to get ahead.” He vowed to stay ‘engaged.’

Since leaving office in 2017 and passing the baton to Trump, Obama has also frequently spoken up about democracy.

In December, a month after the 2024 election, Obama renewed a call for pluralism — finding a way to live alongside individuals and groups who are different — and spoke about what’s at stake without invoking Trump’s name.

“Because the alternative is what we’ve seen here in the United States and in many democracies around the globe,” Obama said at his annual forum on the topic. “Not just more gridlock and just public cynicism, but an increasing willingness on the part of politicians and their followers to violate democratic norms, to do anything they can to get their way, to use the power of the state to target critics and journalists and political rivals, and to even resort to violence in order to gain and hold onto power.

“We’ve seen that movie a lot,” he said, adding that he wasn’t “going to pretend that there are easy answers.”

Since Jan. 20, however, the former presidents have mostly been quiet.

When Trump announced earlier this month that he was shuttering the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), Obama did take to the social platform X to make his voice heard, linking to an opinion piece in The New York Times.

“USAID has been fighting disease, feeding children, and promoting goodwill around the world for six decades,” Obama wrote in the post. “As this article makes clear, dismantling this agency would be a profound foreign policy mistake.”

“Congress should resist,” Obama added.

Still, the other former presidents have refrained from weighing in on any of Trump’s actions.

Some say Bush would have the most powerful voice as a Republican, but he has made it a point over the years never to “step on” the current president, as one former Bush aide put it.

“It’s out of respect to the office,” the former Bush aide said. “It’s just not his style.”

Generally speaking, ex-presidents are loathe to publicly criticize the actions of their successors, at least outside election season. Trump, in his four years out of office, was a notable exception.

In that vein, Democratic strategist Lynda Tran said “in the age of Trump, it’s more important than ever that we respect and adhere to long-standing traditions” to not debate with the current leader of the country.

“We should have faith in the other branches of government — and the advocacy and justice movements — to take action to push back where appropriate.”

Susan Del Percio, a veteran Republican strategist who does not support Trump, said it’s a fruitless effort for the former presidents to speak out against him.

“They can’t, and they know it,” Del Percio said. “If they lend their voices to the conversation, they’ll just be taken down by Trump. If they speak out, it’ll be for the history books, not to affect the Trump presidency now.”

“No one can influence Trump right now, because he doesn’t care what anyone thinks,” Del Percio continued. “It seems to me, given his actions, he acts as if he knows best.”

“There’s no influencing,” she added. “These presidents know that; if anything, they understand better than anybody the power of the presidency.”

 

Alt text for screen readers: A fake headline that looks like a news network covering a story reading:

"TALAXIAN PEDO ARRESTED - ACCUSED OF HAVING RELATIONSHIP WITH 2 YEAR OLD"

The image features Neelix's photoshopped onto the following:

A mugshot in an prisoner's orange jumpsuit, frowning.

Being escorted by a police officer.

A photo of Kes and Neelix, with Kes' eyes being censored by a black bar for concealing her identity.

 
133
submitted 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) by eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/anarchism@lemmy.dbzer0.com
 

You call out Russia or China, MLs think if they regurgitate "read theory" that solves my issues with them.

You call out American liberals and how they aid fascists, you're calling a secret Trump supporter.

You say that genocide is an evil action, liberals and Tankies will defend their favorite country's actions because you're a shill for the enemy if you do.

You say America did something kinda good, you're somehow a neolib in disguise. You lightly praise the USSR, you're Stalin's second cousin as an AI.

I just don't want people harmed by a government force. Fuck me, I guess? I feel like I'm taking crazy pills for applying the same morals to every politician and country, even ones I live in or slightly like.

Edit: If someone said it was annoying being an leftist and a bunch of liberals came in exusing their actions and doubling down, everyone would be singing a different tune. Just kinda fascinating.

view more: next ›