PC Gaming

10920 readers

213 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

Be Respectful.
No Spam or Porn.
No Advertising.
No Memes.
No Tech Support.
No questions about buying/building computers.
No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

913

@steamdb.info‬ "Players have been asking for the ability to filter out games made with Gen AI. We've added an automatic tag on SteamDB based on the AI gen content disclosures on the store pages." (bsky.app)

submitted 2 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

128 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 months ago (35 children)

The sad part is, one day in the (far) future, when real AI (not LLMs) are an actual thing, and they could code great games from scratch, there would be so much bad animosity towards AI by then that they'll probably never see their games played.

~This~ ~comment~ ~is~ ~licensed~ ~under~ ~CC~ ~BY-NC-SA~ ~4.0~

[–] [email protected] 21 points 2 months ago (5 children)

I like human created art because it's created by humans. If AI generated the greatest song, image, or video game i would not care—i don't want it.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 months ago (4 children)

I like human created art because it’s created by humans. If AI generated the greatest song, image, or video game i would not care—i don’t want it.

Your opinion seems prejudicial, focusing on the creator of the art, and not the art itself.

~This~ ~comment~ ~is~ ~licensed~ ~under~ ~CC~ ~BY-NC-SA~ ~4.0~

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Your comment seems loaded with purposefully inflammatory language intended to align AI with groups of actual real people who experience prejudice in the real world instead of corporations who have a vested interest in not paying artists, and brother, as a trans person, it makes you look like a real silly goose.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Your comment seems loaded with purposefully inflammatory language

Pointing out that someone justifies if they like something or not by who made it, vs by judging the item being made itself, is inflammatory?

as a trans person, it makes you look like a real silly goose.

I remember back in the 80's where people were hating on a Top 40 song because it was made by a group who's singer was gay, and thought that was very wrong, that the song itself should be judged on its own merits, and not by who was singing it.

Weird how those lessons learned fade away, needing to be learned again.

~This~ ~comment~ ~is~ ~licensed~ ~under~ ~CC~ ~BY-NC-SA~ ~4.0~

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

AI isn't human. Stop pretending it is. AI takes advantage of humans. Your argument is invalid.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I did mention previously about "in the future", some day, not today. LLMs are not AI, at least the kind of AI that I'm talking about.

But even taking your point, do we let a human always keep a job that an AI can do much for efficiently? What job protections should humans have from AIs? And for that matter, what job protections should humans have today, right now, regardless of AI? (For the record, I support Unions.)

We all need to figure this out, right now, as corporations are salavating at the though of an AI that can replace a human being's job.

~This~ ~comment~ ~is~ ~licensed~ ~under~ ~CC~ ~BY-NC-SA~ ~4.0~

load more comments (2 replies)

load more comments (31 replies)