this post was submitted on 24 Feb 2025
913 points (100.0% liked)

PC Gaming

11014 readers
587 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
913
@steamdb.info‬ "Players have been asking for the ability to filter out games made with Gen AI. We've added an automatic tag on SteamDB based on the AI gen content disclosures on the store pages." (bsky.app)
submitted 2 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
128 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Your comment seems loaded with purposefully inflammatory language

Pointing out that someone justifies if they like something or not by who made it, vs by judging the item being made itself, is inflammatory?

as a trans person, it makes you look like a real silly goose.

I remember back in the 80's where people were hating on a Top 40 song because it was made by a group who's singer was gay, and thought that was very wrong, that the song itself should be judged on its own merits, and not by who was singing it.

Weird how those lessons learned fade away, needing to be learned again.

~This~ ~comment~ ~is~ ~licensed~ ~under~ ~CC~ ~BY-NC-SA~ ~4.0~

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

AI isn't human. Stop pretending it is. AI takes advantage of humans. Your argument is invalid.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I did mention previously about "in the future", some day, not today. LLMs are not AI, at least the kind of AI that I'm talking about.

But even taking your point, do we let a human always keep a job that an AI can do much for efficiently? What job protections should humans have from AIs? And for that matter, what job protections should humans have today, right now, regardless of AI? (For the record, I support Unions.)

We all need to figure this out, right now, as corporations are salavating at the though of an AI that can replace a human being's job.

~This~ ~comment~ ~is~ ~licensed~ ~under~ ~CC~ ~BY-NC-SA~ ~4.0~