this post was submitted on 11 Feb 2025
307 points (100.0% liked)
Leopards Ate My Face
7185 readers
417 users here now
Rules:
- The mods are fallible; if you've been banned or had a post/comment removed, please appeal.
- Off-topic posts will be removed. If you don't know what "Leopards ate my Face" is, try reading this post.
- If the reason your post meets Rule 1 isn't in the source, you must add a source in the post body (not the comments) to explain this.
- Posts should use high-quality sources, and posts about an article should have the same headline as that article. You may edit your post if the source changes the headline. For a rough idea, check out this list.
- For accessibility reasons, an image of text must either have alt text or a transcription in the post body.
- Reposts within 1 year or the Top 100 of all time are subject to removal.
- This is not exclusively a US politics community. You're encouraged to post stories about anyone from any place in the world at any point in history as long as you meet the other rules.
- All Lemmy.World Terms of Service apply.
Also feel free to check out [email protected] (also active).
Icon credit C. Brück on Wikimedia Commons.
_portrait.jpg){kind=link}
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
😂😂😂
Vegans get off on acting like they're better than everyone else for eating 'clean' whilst willfully ignoring the damage that's done to our planet by shoving pesticides and fungicides into the soil and waterways.
While I admire the attempt, no there's simply no way a vegan will ever do something like this. In the mind of every vegan, they've already done their part by eating only plants.
Yes. Veganism has all sorts of issues. Their way leads to a world with less biodiversity not more. It is also propped up by the industrial times we live in.
They like to point out that some areas have been vegan for centuries while ignoring the mortality rates those areas had during those times. Famines were common.
There entire ideology is based on a biased examination of the data and their need to silence anyone that questions their dietary choices is a huge red flag. They and they alone are allowed to question others choices but what this t do isn't question, because they already think they have the answers so instead their ridicule.
Yes.
A wide range of animals only exist because we include them in our food chain. Saving a few samples still reduces the bio diversity.
A wide range of plants only exist because they are useful for feeding the animals we include in our food chain. There is no reason to grow feed corn if there are no animals to feed it to.
There is likely second order affects where the biom feeds of these two things and would disappear. This is a bit more hand wavy but we already have evidence that monocrops and pesticides are doing this.