this post was submitted on 10 Mar 2025
117 points (100.0% liked)

Ye Power Trippin' Bastards

981 readers
50 users here now

This is a community in the spirit of "Am I The Asshole" where people can post their own bans from lemmy or reddit or whatever and get some feedback from others whether the ban was justified or not.

Sometimes one just wants to be able to challenge the arguments some mod made and this could be the place for that.


Posting Guidelines

All posts should follow this basic structure:

  1. Which mods/admins were being Power Tripping Bastards?
  2. What sanction did they impose (e.g. community ban, instance ban, removed comment)?
  3. Provide a screenshot of the relevant modlog entry (don’t de-obfuscate mod names).
  4. Provide a screenshot and explanation of the cause of the sanction (e.g. the post/comment that was removed, or got you banned).
  5. Explain why you think its unfair and how you would like the situation to be remedied.

Rules


Expect to receive feedback about your posts, they might even be negative.

Make sure you follow this instance's code of conduct. In other words we won't allow bellyaching about being sanctioned for hate speech or bigotry.

YTPB matrix channel: For real-time discussions about bastards or to appeal mod actions in YPTB itself.


Some acronyms you might see.


Relevant comms

founded 7 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Right... What are we trying to protect the kid here from...

If he knows how to use fedi prolly already using Linux too... Anyone with Linux skills will figure a way around anything online tbh

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

I think it's less about protecting the kid but about liability. You can just enter under 18, but they have to do something when you boast about it. It's not as if check your ID.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

What's the liability? Tiktok and faceberg permits teenagers to use their websites and nothing ever happened to them.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

to recommend content like videos and posts could “exploit the weaknesses and inexperience” of children and stimulate “addictive behaviour.” It’

Are you suggesting that Lemmy instances are engaged in behaviour like this?

Do you have evidence?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

There's porn and violence and other adult content on Lemmy instances.

You gotta follow the law of your target countries or youll end up in the dark net.

The links were to disprove your claim nobody is holding them accountable.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

There's porn and violence and other adult content on Lemmy instances.

So nothing then...

You gotta follow the law of your target countries or youll end up in the dark net.

Everyone follows the law... How is permitting a teenager to use a public message board violates the law?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

You wann do business in a country, you got to follow its laws. Easy as is.

Heres an example of such law.

https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/juschg/BJNR273000002.html

Hate voting me doesnt change facts, it just makes you look ignorant.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Im not your personal translator.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

You provided German text to support your argument during a discussion conducted in English

I am trying to determine if there is any validity to your argument but it appears that you are also talking out of your ass with the "law" talking point.

I have done this exercise several times here on this topic and your side has yet to provide anything to support the position beyond broad appeal to authority. Which is at best a bootlicker argument.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

You accuse me of talking out of my ass but would trust my word more than the actual law that you can translate by the press of one button?

I call bullshit.

Maybe trust people on the Internet less and read up on the actual source sometimes.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Im not licking anyones boots but the admins have to follow laws they want to conduct business.

Also, following the law is boot licking now? Is this some anarchist hellhole or something?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/juschg/BJNR273000002.html

just one example

But now I got to wonder of you're a bot or have the memory of a fly.

Edit: here is a EU directive for the stubborn

https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=LEGISSUM:am0005

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago

There’s porn and violence and other adult content on Lemmy instances.

Like there is in movies, TV, art, history, and other websites.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

A little bit of a late response, but the difference is that tiktok and facebook have a legal team, which we do not. One lawsuit and we would basically be toast.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

Oh Yea I use Linux it's even in Profile xD

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

If he knows how to use [fediverse sites][, he is] prolly already using Linux too... Anyone with Linux skills will figure a way around anything online [to be honest.]

Yes, the same as if I lock a door someone breaking the rules will just climb in a window, and that should somehow be okay but isn't.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 weeks ago

That's how the internet works...