this post was submitted on 20 Mar 2025
63 points (100.0% liked)

Games

18244 readers
1408 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Because it's a lot of work to remake a game. Besides SS2 doesn't really need a full remake.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Were you not a fan of what they did with the SS1 remake? I thought it was well received even by fans of the originals? It's still on my backlog list but it looks amazing and I'd love to experience SS2 with the same treatment applied to it. Maybe SS2 is a rare exception but I personally tend to think early 3D games are pretty much ideal candidates for remakes as they tend to age poorly in both engine, visuals and gameplay. Not to mention controls and QoL.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

The SS1 remake was amazing. But you have to remember the amount of work it takes to remake a game, SS1 was in development for many years.

SS1 really needed a remake, SS1 had awful controls and cumbersome UI, combat was also a bit fiddly.

I would say SS2 is much closer to a modern game than SS1 was, so I'm not surprised they decided to remaster it. I would also be surprised if they earned back the money they spent on that remake.

Remaking a game basically means creating an entire new game, then ensuring that it acts the exact same way as the original. The remake is most likely not written in the same game engine as the original so that means A LOT of tweaking to get gameplay, combat, triggers, event handling etc. to work the exact same as it did earlier.

I just wish people would understand how hard it is to make a game. Changing the game engine could easily set the team back 1-2 years.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 days ago

I wouldn't mind a little rebalancing though. There were quite a few builds that were basically ultra-hard-mode to finish the game with. If you played suboptimal, you got soft locked pretty quickly.