Ask Lemmy
A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions
Rules: (interactive)
1) Be nice and; have fun
Doxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them
2) All posts must end with a '?'
This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?
3) No spam
Please do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.
4) NSFW is okay, within reason
Just remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either [email protected] or [email protected].
NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].
5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions.
If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email [email protected]. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.
6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try [email protected] or [email protected]
Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.
Partnered Communities:
Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu
view the rest of the comments
to be fair what they've built is amazing, and good enough for 80-90% of the time. but it needs to be 99.9999% of the time and thats not this year. they will release something of course, and rely on remote human intervention, and many people will die. but the media wont mention it and the statistics will be buried, and when it rains or is foggy or too hot etc millions will all be stranded.
What they've achieved is irrelevant. They're never gonna achieve 99.999% with standard cameras + AI for decades. Elon can't magically manifest the safety of Lidar through hopes and prayers; yet he believes he can, so the only logical conclusion is that he's a complete fucking moron con artist, only skilled at separating people from their money.
If you don't understand this yet, print me out some examples of your best code, and email me a list of your top accomplishments from the last week!
The idea that many people will die in Tesla Autopilot accidents and the media won't mention it is laughable.
I hope that no one will die, but if they do, the media will be all over it. It's way too high profile. He might be able to bury the statistics, since those are mostly under the control of the federal government.
I agree with @[email protected] -- Tesla did some amazing things, and really paved the way for electric vehicles (especially vehicle charging infrastructure). But they went too fast and quality went down and they're trying to make up for it by Magats buying to support Trump.
Tesla is already the most deadly car brand, but why aren't the media already "all over it"? What makes you think it will be any different with autopilot? https://www.rollingstone.com/culture/culture-news/tesla-highest-rate-deadly-accidents-study-1235176092/
They're behind other manufacturers in some ways: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=IQJL3htsDyQ