this post was submitted on 26 Mar 2025
421 points (100.0% liked)

politics

23672 readers
2494 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

This district has been heavily red for the last 60 years

One of the focal points of the campaign from the dem who won was opposition to musk

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Good! If Democrats can KEEP UP The Moment then they Might be able to do ABSOLUTELY NOTHING when they Win a HUGE MARGIN OF VICTORY in the Midterms!

[–] [email protected] 31 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children)

Dems are pressurable. Republicans are lot harder to pressure

Elections decide who you have to work with

They alone won't fully fix things, but they can set the stage for progress

It's going to take both voting and directed pressure to change things

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Republicans are lot harder to pressure

Republicans caved to the Tea Party and a catch phrase. They are ridiculously easy to pressure.

The Democrats have been fighting against their own constituency for decades, pushing Hillary over Obama in 2008, Hillary over Bernie in 2016, and whatever you want to call that clusterfuck last year.

Hopefully, we can finally get a Guillotine Party to do to the Democrats what the Tea Party did to the GOP.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

Republicans got the Tea Party. Democrats are getting the Guillotine Party.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

Under what proof are Democrats pressurable?

Like, actually.
One party seems to be have actually adjusted its party to match the citizens requests and has an average age of their house leaders over 20 years younger.
Not for the better but change happened. Where is that present in the DNC?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Schumer is proof they are pressurable!

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 months ago

Very true. His donors apply pressure all the time!

[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 months ago

get out here with that defeatist bs.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Look, Pennsylvanians know a thing or two about election a representative, that representative having a personality changing life event, and then that representative going on to fix absolutely nothing and in fact make things measurably worse.

But even still they did the math, calculated the risk:reward of their vote, held their nose and cast their ballots.

Just as I have for every election my whole life.

You want real, meaningful change? Support progressive candidates at the local level who will be in a position to get rid of first past the post voting. The two party system that enables the Democrats' laziness is a direct, organic result of FPTP. Thankfully how voting works is legislated at the local level, meaning if we can get some form of Rank Choice then suddenly Democrats are going to have to care A LOT because it'll be easier to vote them out without simultaneously voting a Republican in.

But until we can fix the source of the problem (FPTP) damage mitigation will continue to be the name of the game, and it'll be a game we will eventually, inevitably lose.

We CAN fix it, but we need less cynicism* and apathy.

*I didn't say "no cynicism" that'd be terrible, I don't think I could get through the day without a cup or two... But everything in moderation, ya know?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

We did that locally, then the dems teamed up with the GOP to defeat all of that, and then helped elected GOP county seats.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

FPTP allows it, but FPTP is not the cause. We have had progressive politics in this country before, even with FPTP.

The cause is party leadership that is completely out of touch with reality.