DRM
A community for the discussion of topics surrounding DRM, Digital Rights Management.
All media that DRM can be applied on can be discussed here, for example books, movies, music or games.
Digital rights management (DRM) is the management of legal access to digital content. Various tools or technological protection measures, such as access control technologies, can restrict the use of proprietary hardware and copyrighted works. DRM technologies govern the use, modification and distribution of copyrighted works (e.g. software, multimedia content) and of systems that enforce these policies within devices. DRM technologies include licensing agreements and encryption.
Guides and useful tools
Quick and dirty way to rip an eBook from Android
2025 Guide for freeing books from Amazon (after D&T was removed)
Guide to Removing DRM From Amazon Kindle E-Books
Liberate your Kindle books before leaving Amazon (Tutorial)
How to setup Calibre to remove DRM from ebooks on Linux/Archive mirror
Guide on removing DRM from Kobo & Kindle eBooks (reddit mirror, Archive link)
Extracting content from an LCP "protected" ePub
DeDRM tools for eBooks: a plugin for Calibre for removing Adobe DRM, Obok etc.
Miscellaneous links
DRM - Frequently Asked Questions by DefectiveByDesign
Guide to DRM-Free Living by DefectiveByDesign
view the rest of the comments
Y'all could just pay π€·ββοΈ
Make the app worth paying for. I pay for Nebula because its worth it
Then don't use it f you like nebula. Why are you all wasting time bitching about an app that's not worth it?
Because they are thieves and hate having that pointed out to them
πππ€‘
How's that boot taste?
Better than being poor and delusional about being entitled to steal π€£
I honestly love the bootlicker tag. It tells me everything I need to know about your alignment with reality. You just want to be mad to argue on the Internet. Nothing based in reality to offer. A sad deplorable existence.
Woah now, be careful or you'll choke on all that corpo dick.
Keep on going, almost there
It's always ethical to steal from billion dollar corporations
Okay, but you have the expectations of them making it easy?
Folks in here feel entitled to the easy of blocking ads while simultaneously decrying the value of the service and refusal to pay.
I've never actually found it difficult to bypass the ads, despite their attempts. Literally, at least for now, you can use uBlock to block the warning lol
life finds a way
I do pay and I use SmartTube. If it stops working, I'll stop paying.
The only legit complaint in this thread. I agree, that sucks ass. Shit like that makes stuff like f1tv(garbage app) bearable. I'd have quit without F1 multiviewer.
I used to when the price was fair for family plan, but now I'm on the high seas. It's a price issue, they are making billions , no need to fleece us.
False. Fake news. You've just invented that out of nowhere like a desperate trumpet who doesn't know how to use Google.
YT has never made a dime unless that's changed in the last year. YT has always been a loss leader.
Stop lying to win internet arguments. It's pathetic and sad.
Your info is very outdated, YouTube made billions in profit for years already
It doesn't matter what YouTube makes. They belong to google, and the data they harvest goes to google as well. Their algorithm's influence on what people see and on their opinions contributes to google's success and political interests, just as Xitter does for Musk. And by staying "free" to use, they ensure that no competitor will likely rise up and take those benefits from them. If they try to shut out third party apps and browsers, that's because by forcing people into Chrome they can harvest even more data.
I know youβre getting downvoted here but there is a valid question there. Itβs the largest streaming site on the internet which takes up massive amounts of storage and bandwidth. How do people propose itβs paid for? You generally either have to have ads (which it seems everyone hates) or you pay for a subscription (which everyone hates). So what is the best model to offset that cost? Itβs not a public service.
The problem isn't ads or subscription fees, the problem is ads and subscription fees in addition to the data scraping. Google, and by extension Youtube, harvest your data from all over the internet and use it to sell ads. The data and CAPTCHAs you see all over from Google are trackers (that's how clicking a box can determine you're human) that ars harvesting data and fingerprinting your device to make you easier to identify.
In 2025, do you really want a demonstrably evil company that supports the American kleptocracy to have access to your data?
In comes freetube and invidious: responses to the above problem. By acting proxy to youtube you avoid the ads (which contain spyware) and you avoid downloading site data from Google (which likely contains spyware).
It isn't a payment issue, and the pirates aren't upset about costs, it's just that in the age of glass walls online, we want our fucking privacy back.
Okay. So if they were willing to stop the data scraping, how many people do you think would be willing to pay for a subscription or increased ads to offset the costs?
More than you'd think, but if folks are like myself than not as many as g-daddy would need to justify the switch to a more legitimate model.
Personally, when a company unilaterally decides it can do whatever the π¦ it wants with my data, I believe that road goes both ways, so I'll do whatever the π¦ I want with theirs. Including downloading it without paying.
None of them. You know this answer. They would screech if it were $50 a month.
Just bring up kagi and see how many folks make up excuses why they suck and ain't worth it.
They just want a post facto reason to justify their pirating and stealing. They never were going to pay.
Yeah. That's why Netflix went out of business so quickly.
You don't think Netflix scrapes your data to offset the price?
Y'all jumping through some wild hoops to win an internet argument π€£
You're acting like A) it's not part of a company pulling down billion dollar profits and B) any loss isn't being used to depress tax paid by other arms of said company
We already do, and this is what we get.
I support that. Why do you care about drm of YouTube then if you aren't using it?
Do people not recognize obvious bait anymore? Why did this comment get so much engagement?
It's not bait. I think the service offers value and is worth the $15 a month if you use it a lot.
This is the media equivalent of leaving a shit steam review with 2000 hours clocked.
$15/yr and I'd be down. $15/mo can eat my ass.
There's a vast difference between Steam being good, and the content in Steam being good.
Not when I can't even get a DRM-free MP3 from the payments. If I could, I'd reconsider that.
I know I know, that's how the world works. You as the buyer get to set the terms π€£