this post was submitted on 09 Apr 2025
456 points (100.0% liked)

solarpunk memes

3889 readers
178 users here now

For when you need a laugh!

The definition of a "meme" here is intentionally pretty loose. Images, screenshots, and the like are welcome!

But, keep it lighthearted and/or within our server's ideals.

Posts and comments that are hateful, trolling, inciting, and/or overly negative will be removed at the moderators' discretion.

Please follow all slrpnk.net rules and community guidelines

Have fun!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 month ago (6 children)

And how much CO2 was produced training the AI that was put on your device? How many slaves spent how many hours generating data to train that AI? How many slaves cut down how many forests to extract the materials that how many slaves turned into the chips that ran the training process?

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 month ago

And how much CO2 was produced training the AI that was put on your device?

I mean, fuck Apple and fuck AI. But at some point "I noticed your picture was rendered with software that uses electricity that may have come from a fossil fuel power source, so I'm going to disregard environmentalism carte blanche" is just reactionary anti-environmentalist rhetoric couched in smug liberalist language.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 month ago

If only he didn't generate that image! I can't believe he made Apple generate that whole model!

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago

And how much CO2 was produced training the AI that was put on your device?

Depends on where the data centre was that did the processing

If in nordics or france then practically nothing, if in California then depending on the day/time of year, how much wind/solar/battery was going probably minimal

https://electrek.co/2024/12/31/california-grid-100-percent-renewables-no-blackouts-cost-rises/

if somewhere with only coal plants then a decent amount

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Focusing climate change on individual contribution alienates people from the movement. Instead of wasting your energy making one person feel bad, maybe focus on the corporations that are actually responsible for producing that CO2 and cutting down those forests while hiding that reality from the consumer.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

I’m unsure about that. But seeing how stupid it is, and knowing that Apple produces green energy through Apple Energy LLC, I suspect not enough CO2 was produced 😂 /s

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

I actually don't know, how much was it?