this post was submitted on 09 Apr 2025
571 points (100.0% liked)

World News

47530 readers
2714 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 143 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Wild take here but I don't really think the US should be bombing ANY other nation.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Not even Israeli or Russian troops in Palestine or Ukraine?

[–] [email protected] 30 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The US could just stop sending weapons to Israel and the fighting will stop too. As for Ukraine, Zelensky has tried to make deals with Russia before and the West told him not to because they promised they'd continue backing him with more weapons that would give them the edge, which the US is obviously reneging on now (which, to be fair, is something Trump sort of said he'd do, so you could argue that's been democratically decided).

[–] [email protected] 44 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Agreed on Israel, but you are WILDLY misrepresenting the context and tenor of the Ukrainian war.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

https://www.pravda.com.ua/eng/news/2022/05/5/7344206/

They were close to a deal during a relative high water mark (Ukraine had just taken Kharkiv back and a huge chunk of the east). They've only gone backwards since and whatever deal they can get now will most likely be worse.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 2 months ago (1 children)

They were not close to a deal. Putin’s desired endgame is “I own Ukraine”. Ukraine’s desired endgame is “Ukraine continues to exist and isn’t constantly hammered by Russian missiles and bombs”. There’s not really much room for negotiation there. Moreover, Putin has negotiated in demonstrably bad faith multiple times over the course of the war (and I mean since 2014, when they used unmarked soldiers to annex parts of Ukraine and “held a referendum”). I’m not claiming Ukraine is a flawless paragon of virtue, but at the same time, there are VERY clear good guys and bad guys in the Ukrainian government war. Russia is the bad guys.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I didn't ever say the Russians were the good guys. I'm saying the West is happy to keep Ukrainians fighting and dying for geopolitical reasons. Zelensky was elected on a platform of making a deal and ending the war, and he wasn't allowed to do that by the West.

Eventually there will be a peace, and even though it would be fair that Ukraine gets all its territory back, realistically that's not going to happen (and if it did, there's the question of what happens to all the Russian speakers in those areas). The deal he could've gotten right after the failed Russian invasion would've been better than whatever he can get now, especially with Trump now basically being in Putin's side.

It's just a case of the US continuing to push too far thinking you can just beat Russia with better technology, even though history has shown that Russian leaders are perfectly happy to just throw men into the battle until the enemy runs out of ammo.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Do you believe Ukrainians have no agency? Nobody but Russia is forcing them to fight.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

They have, but they were promised the backing of the US, and now they're not going to have it any more.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

~~Cool source bro~~

I was wrong, this is independent of Pravda in Russia. My bad.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago (2 children)

So a Ukrainian news paper isn't good enough? I can find other sources for the same story if you like. Or you can search for stories that explore the background of Johnson's sudden Kyiv trip yourself.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago

Shit, my bad dude. You’re right, it’s independent of Pravda in Russia.

https://www.bostonglobe.com/2022/04/29/opinion/story-their-lives/

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Not to be confused with Prada, Pravda.ru, Komsomolskaya Pravda, Ukrainska Pravda, pravda DE, pravda EN, pravda ES, pravda FR, or pravda PL.

Come on man, at least read the links you post.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Jesus, why did they choose that name? I get that it means truth, but surely it was tainted by the then 88 year old newspaper in the country that colonized yours? Imagine if an Algerian person, fed up with French interference in their media, founded the Algerian newspaper, Le Monde.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Seeing how popular the name is, I suspect it's just a very generic newspaper name, like how a lot of English-language newspapers have Times in their names. For example, India has The Times of India and The Hindustan Times, despite the name coming from a former colonizer.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

I can understand that, but I suspect that neither calls itself The Times. In countries with a large newspaper known as a Times, The Times is called The London Times to differentiate itself

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Correct. The US should stick to the tried and true method of supplying the weapons, teaching users how to maximize their effectiveness, and assist in the logistics of the altercations.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Or just stop sticking our nose into everyone else's business.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

Into Russia's business? Because assisting Ukraine is not "sticking our nose in" their business any more than the fire department is sticking their nose in your business when you call to report a fire.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

Haha I respect that

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

Whoa! Calm down!