834
New Math (lemmynsfw.com)
submitted 3 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago

Why did this have to be the UBI guy?

Was Yang controlled opposition or just dumb as shit?

[-] [email protected] 29 points 3 months ago

What are you talking about? Yang is the one who is right here.

[-] [email protected] 13 points 3 months ago

They're just upset they have to agree with someone they don't like.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

I just don't think he's electable, i would still vote for him tho.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

Why, it seems like you really don't like him

[-] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

Because he's an idiot who got UBI laughed out of the room.

And UBI is required for equality in our post scarcity world.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

TLDR - The use of notation is poor - I'd call it sloppy. His post would be much better (to me) without the example.

Most alarmingly he's written an inequality as an equality, and he's not really explaining the units / percentages at all. I think this type of thing is really unhelpful to people who struggle with maths and maths notation. It seems evident that the last reply's author does struggle and the example is part of their confusion, it certainly didn't help.

It makes me think he doesn't give a shit what he writes or about the audience. That makes me inclined to give no shits about it too. Either way this style of communication is all red flags to me - I guess thats why I avoid all this twittery in general.

Anyway, I guess I care enough to type a few more shits . . . I'm sure i've already put in way more thought than the OOP . . . I think he should have written something that spells out a bit more what is going on , and used an inequality, like:

  • 100 - 100 x (10/100) != 90 + 90 x (10/100)
  • 100 - 100 x (10/100) > 90 + 90 x (10/100)

Or:

  • 100 - 100 x (10/100) = 90
  • 90 + 90 x (10/100) = 99

As others have pointed out, in some contexts (like price indices) people convert time series data into indexes where 1 unit is referenced to: 100*1/(nominal reference price)

So for units defined as "percent of reference price", we d can use the simple expressions:

  • 100 - 10 =90
  • 90 + 10=100 (edited my own slop)

Some people might, also sloppily, refer to the 10 as a "percent change" as shorthand for the units. It is a percentage, but one should be clear percent of what.

If the context is more specifically weighted price indices then it can get more complex, but commentators may simply by saying "up by 10%", when it's really a more complex index value movement where the weightings can change. This all makes financial data in particular very confusing to those who struggle with maths, which is bad and it'd be nice if these things were communicated in a way that makes it as easy as possible for them.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago

I mean, he was right about what AI was about to do. Expecting everyone to be able to live on $1000/month and not taking about the huge concentrations of wealth and power was the idiotic part.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago

10 percent of 90 is 9.

90 + 9 = 99

this post was submitted on 11 Apr 2025
834 points (100.0% liked)

Funny: Home of the Haha

7676 readers
5 users here now

Welcome to /c/funny, a place for all your humorous and amusing content.

Looking for mods! Send an application to Stamets!

Our Rules:

  1. Keep it civil. We're all people here. Be respectful to one another.

  2. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia or any other flavor of bigotry. I should not need to explain this one.

  3. Try not to repost anything posted within the past month. Beyond that, go for it. Not everyone is on every site all the time.


Other Communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS