this post was submitted on 01 May 2025
485 points (100.0% liked)

Funny: Home of the Haha

7038 readers
1079 users here now

Welcome to /c/funny, a place for all your humorous and amusing content.

Looking for mods! Send an application to Stamets!

Our Rules:

  1. Keep it civil. We're all people here. Be respectful to one another.

  2. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia or any other flavor of bigotry. I should not need to explain this one.

  3. Try not to repost anything posted within the past month. Beyond that, go for it. Not everyone is on every site all the time.


Other Communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 43 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Hence why I ask. Seems to really trigger the slop Peddlers.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

This one is especially baffling. It would take longer to get AI to make this than it would take to do by hand, let alone digitally.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I mean, I can't draw trees that well, so anything I made would use the same process as AI: look on the web for images of a forest, steal it, superimpose words on it. It just wouldn't burn several kilowatts of energy if I did it.

This is not a defense of AI; I'm just saying. I can see why someone might take that route.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 weeks ago

If you did it by hand you could at least credit the original artist that you took the picture from for your txt background. With Ai the theft is impersonal slop.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago

Why are you so obsessed with that lol.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago

Nice. Love that.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I could tell from the thumbnail by the yellow background alone.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Scarily, I've stopped being able to tell most of the time. It used to be real easy.

Granted, I'm not consciously looking for it, and I'm naturally trusting / semj-gullable so I don't instinctively look for it either.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago

If it's comic style it's really obvious, at least to me. A good rule of thumb: if the background isn't pure white and there's no signature or anything indicating an author, it's probably AI slop, especially if it's a clean image.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago

A person after my own heart...